You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Fri, Oct 30, 2009 : 9:45 a.m.

Saline ACH workers among latest in UAW to turn down Ford contract changes

By AnnArbor.com Staff

DETROIT — Workers at two more United Auto Workers locals, including one in Saline, overwhelmingly rejected changes to their contract with Ford Motor Co. on Thursday, casting further doubt on whether the deal will be approved.

Workers at Automotive Components Holdings parts-making plant in Saline voted 75 percent against the deal, while research and engineering employees in Dearborn, Mich., voted roughly 90 percent against the deal, according to local union officials and tallies posted on a Web site.

"The membership has spoken," Mark Caruso, president of the 1,800-member Saline local, said shortly after his members rejected the deal. The Saline plant received a promise of additional work in the latest contract changes.

ACH is a holding company set up by Ford for plants it is preparing to sell. A spokeswoman for the company said last week the plant is now operating at full capacity and efforts to sell it have been suspended until the market improves.

An exact count of the votes so far was not available Thursday night, but at least eight UAW locals representing about 12,500 workers have voted down the deal, many overwhelmingly. Only about four locals with a total of 7,000 members have favored the pact.

Ford sought the deal to bring its labor costs in line with Detroit rivals Chrysler Group LLC and General Motors Co., both of which won concessions from the union as they headed into bankruptcy protection earlier this year. If it fails, the Dearborn-based automaker will have higher labor costs than competitors and therefore a tougher time consistently turning a profit.

Ford is the only Detroit-area automaker to avoid bankruptcy protection and not take aid from the U.S. government. But it has a far higher debt load than Chrysler and GM, and higher labor costs could hurt efforts to make a comeback.

Friday likely is a key day of voting on the agreement, with large locals at factories in Louisville, Ky., and Dearborn, Mich., to finish up balloting. The Louisville local has roughly 5,000 workers, while the Dearborn local has about 8,000 who work for Ford. Some elected leaders of the Dearborn local have opposed the pact, and the local is the center of the opposition.

Ford has a total of 41,000 workers represented by the UAW in the United States.

Rocky Comito, president of the Louisville local, said the vote was too close to call at this point.

"It's a mixed bag," Comito said Wednesday. "I couldn't call it."

At meetings held to explain the deal, workers objected to a limit on the right to strike and questioned why Ford was seeking further changes now when the union already changed the contract once in February, Comito said. Workers also approved a new contract with concessions in 2007, and made health care concessions in 2005.

Ford and UAW leaders agreed to make another round of changes to their 2007 labor agreement two weeks ago, bringing Ford in line with labor cost cuts already agreed to at GM and Chrysler. But workers must ratify the changes for them to go into effect.

Workers would get a $1,000 bonus if the deal is ratified, but the proposal also would freeze entry-level wages and require some skilled-trades workers to do more than one job. The union also agreed not to strike Ford if the two sides disagree on wage or benefit increases, although the UAW could still strike over other issues.

Gettelfinger has said that the deal saves 7,000 union jobs with new product commitments at several assembly plants that also will help factories that make auto components.

Workers at factories in Claycomo, Mo., and Livonia, Plymouth, Sterling Heights, Flat Rock, Ypsilanti Township, Mich., have rejected the deal thus far. Locals in Wayne, Mich.; Cleveland; Indianapolis and St. Paul, Minn., have voted in favor.

Voting is scheduled to end by Monday.

Comments

ownrdgd

Sun, Nov 1, 2009 : 1:42 p.m.

Ford motor company is not going the same way as gm /chrysler.There stock has increased 7 fold in 8 months.They are way ahead of the others in sales.They have a great product line.So they lost a few things in the recent vote,they got 500 million in reduced compensation from the rank and file in march so suck it up and move on and worry about it in 2011.I don't see the upper management folks giving any of there million dollar wages back to help the company. Mullay got $5 million in salary plus $8.7 million in stock last year.Didn't hear him wanting to give any of it back. Its a two way street.When times are tuff both parties need to help each other out for the good of the company.Not just dump it on the workers back and expect them to carry the load.

John Galt

Sat, Oct 31, 2009 : 11 a.m.

The UAW will come to regret this. Ford did the right thing by avoiding the government bailouts and bankruptcy. They tried to "go it alone" like a company should, instead of stealing from the taxpayer. Now we will see how an honest compnay gets rewarded in this "Atlas Shrugged"-type environment. The Union action will now result in the destruction of Ford, too. They cannot compete against GM and Chrysler now. Why? Because GM/Chrysler had their debt burden essentially removed. This allows them to avoid paying billions in interest each year on the loans. Ford must still service it's debt. The cost structure at Ford will prevent them from being able to spend as much money on new models, improvements to plant, etc. Also, the pay scale to GM and Chrysler is lower with the re-negoiated contracts. The Unions probably think the government will come to the rescue when they have brought down Ford too. But more likely Ford will be allowed to go under as the public outcry against the earlier bailouts builds.