3 things Ann Arbor should bring away from Michigan's economic development conference
Rich Sheridan spoke about creating a "culture of joy" on the first day of the International Economic Development Council spring conference held at the Michigan League.
Ben Freed | AnnArbor.com
For Ann Arbor and Michigan, the conference was a chance to boast an economic recovery that has been heralded as the “second fastest in the nation,” and to show off local business success stories.
It also was a time to benchmark the region against others in the room and to find nuggets of inspiration to continue the area’s recent economic success. The conference was a study in seeming contradictions: the economy is booming, but there’s still a long way to go; and there are so many talented people, but we can’t find any of them.
Despite the jargon and buzzwords, a few lessons did emerge from the conference for the Ann Arbor community to take to heart.
1. Ann Arbor SPARK is respected by its peers
Ann Arbor SPARK is a ubiquitous presence in the Washtenaw County business community. Co-founded by Gov. Rick Snyder, (who was not governor at the time)who spoke at the conference, and University of Michigan president Mary Sue Coleman in 2006, the local public-private partnership has aided in the creation or retention of nearly 12,000 jobs according to its most recent annual report.
Among other activities, SPARK runs the SPARK Central and SPARK East startup incubators, assists businesses secure tax abatements for expansions and promotes Ann Arbor and the surrounding communities to companies large and small looking for a new home.
While SPARK has had its critics, the organization’s efforts over the past seven years have earned the respect of economic development organizations across the country. At the spring conference, Ann Arbor SPARK became just the 36th economic development organization in the country and the second in Michigan to be accredited by the IEDC.
Accreditation by the economic development council is not a basic standard of quality as it is for universities, but rather a stamp of excellence only achieved by organizations that meet specific benchmarks and milestones.
“Accreditation within our organization is still fairly rare,” IEDC executive director Jeff Finkle said. “It has been compared to getting the Baldrige award as a business. It really means that you are the top in your class.”
2. Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration
There were plenty of other buzzwords thrown around at the IEDC Spring Conference, but the one I heard the most by far was collaboration. If you add in the synonymous “creating partnerships,” the numbers become even more inflated.
So why is collaboration so difficult?
Audience members eat lunch at the Michigan League for the International Economic Development Council conference before hearing Governor Rick Snyder speak on Monday.
Daniel Brenner | AnnArbor.com
“People have to have their own self-interest on the line to make them collaborate. When the level of crises in a situation or an economic sector or a region is greater than the level of complacency, that’s when you get collaboration.”
Perhaps it was the level of crisis Michigan — especially Southeast Michigan — experienced that fostered the spirit of collaboration in the region and across the state. One major collaboration, the New Economy Initiative in Detroit, brought the area’s 10 largest foundations together to put $100 million towards improving the region’s economy.
“These groups came together to speed the transformation to the new knowledge economy and make sure that the local population is able to participate in it,” said Pamela Hurtt, a senior consultant for the initiative.
“The culture needed to change from one of entitlement to one of innovation. We wanted to take on projects that were bigger than any one foundation could have taken on alone.”
Other prominent collaborations in the state include Business Leaders for Michigan, whose members include the CEOs of the 80 largest companies in Michigan, and the Pure Michigan Business Connect network, an initiative that encourages local businesses to purchase goods and services from other Michigan companies.
3. No one has all the answers
This is more of a personal sentiment, and I certainly can’t say I have facts or figures to support the assertion.
“There’s an old adage, that when you’ve seen one economic development organization, you’ve seen one economic development organization,” SPARK CEO Paul Krutko said in an interview before the conference.
The saying certainly held true at the conference. Attendees included representatives from chambers of commerce, public-private partnerships, foundations, governmental organizations, and regional partnerships.
Many of the speakers used buzzwords and broad philosophies to impart their knowledge to the people in attendance, while others focused on specific tactics and strategies that helped grow their company’s profits or in their community’s GDP.
There are any number of commonly given prescriptions for turning around a business or a local economy, but if it was as easy as “being positive,” “embracing change” or “collaborating,” we probably wouldn’t have much use for economic development professionals at all.
Ben Freed covers business for AnnArbor.com. You can sign up here to receive Business Review updates every week. Get in touch with Ben at 734-623-2528 or email him at benfreed@annarbor.com. Follow him on twitter @BFreedinA2.
Comments
jcj
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 3:34 p.m.
At least it was not held on Mackinaw Island.
ManA2
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 1:54 p.m.
However it happened, there is a far more entrepreneurial culture and an increasingly thriving community of start ups in Ann Arbor vs. what there was 10-20 years ago. I think that is great and worth celebrating and supporting. Cynicism about people and organizations does nothing to move us towards better economic growth and jobs.
Rick Stevens
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 1:11 p.m.
Yet another puff piece from Annarbor.com on SPARK. And more bogus job creation numbers - SPARK should be able to list all the jobs created and make (along with their audits) a list of the jobs created: name of the company, title, salary, dates, etc. If you claim it then show it. If you don't then stop lying.
Kai Petainen
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 10:33 p.m.
Ben is right. If they had done this article without mentioning SPARK, it wouldn't be right. They were a major player in the IEDC coming here. and A2.com said.... "aided in the creation or retention of nearly 12,000 jobs according to its" notice the words: "according to its" report They didn't go the next step to verify the numbers -- and you can complain about that.... but they did state the source of the numbers. And it's good that they state those numbers, but when it is time to analyze/critique the IRS forms (one of the few documents that isn't marketing spin), then we can look at what they said vs. what they did in the forms.
Ben Freed
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 1:38 p.m.
Rick, The point of the SPARK section of this column was to note that SPARK was recognized by the International Economic Development Council as one of its top members. It was not AnnArbor.com asserting SPARK's benefit or level of efficacy. I would also like to point out that we always recognize that the job creation/retention numbers are provided to us by SPARK.
hawkhulk
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 1:13 p.m.
The very thought that Governor Snyder started SPARK should be a red flag in itself.
Nicholas Urfe
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 12:48 p.m.
Does Annarbor.com have any ties to SPARK?
Rick Stevens
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 1:15 p.m.
Yes, Laurel Champion was on their board (didn't see her name this year) for years. You won't find any investigative or negative pieces on SPARK here. The Detroit Free Press and A2 Politico did do some good pieces with facts ignored by annarbor.com.
Nicholas Urfe
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 12:47 p.m.
"and there are so many talented people, but we can't find any of them." That often means they don't want to work for cut-rate Michigan compensation, when they can move to an area with lower taxes, a better quality of living, and far more professional options. Or they can work remote and still pull in better compensation.
Brad
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 12:24 p.m.
You calling "culture of joy" buzzwords? Good.
mr_annarbor
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 12:18 p.m.
The whole story makes no sense, if you ask me. Sounds like the writer just picked out some random comments and typed them in.
Steve Bean
Thu, Jun 13, 2013 : 1:23 a.m.
I got the impression that Ben was calling it as he saw it.
Kai Petainen
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 11:50 a.m.
"and there are so many talented people, but we can't find any of them." I think I'm confused by that statement.
Kai Petainen
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 10:29 p.m.
Ben... thanks for the explanation and the link.
Ben Freed
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 1:11 p.m.
I was alluding to the common complaint by companies that they cannot find the talent they need, while at the same time politicians lament high unemployment rates and talk about all of the talent people who can't find jobs. You can read more about it here: http://www.annarbor.com/business-review/gov-snyders-economic-summit-searching-for-answers-as-talented-students-search-for-jobs/
Julie Baker
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 11:34 a.m.
A change has been made in this story.
Rick Stevens
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 1:16 p.m.
What was the change?
Stephen Lange Ranzini
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 11:19 a.m.
The restrictions of the securities laws governing the SEC are the main reason why many of our local start-ups are frequently bought out and shipped away. The good news is that Congress passed and President Obama signed a law changing the rules which previously were too restrictive and prevented entrepreneurs from raising capital from the general public without a tremendous amount of paperwork at great cost. Going forward, entrepreneurs will be able to raise capital through crowd sourcing sites which are themselves regulated by the SEC. Think www.kickstarter.com but now able to sell securities of start-up firms (equity and debt) and not just consumer products. Unfortunately, the SEC has blocked the law from coming into effect because it is staffed by and beholden to Wall Street veterans whose interests are not aligned with this deregulation. The good news is that Congress is taking steps to force the change and required a pledge from the newly appointed SEC chair to implement it. Also the President has proposed to appoint as new SEC commissioners two Senate congressional staff members who helped write the bill and they will receive confirmation quickly. I have proposed to each of Ann Arbor SPARK, and the city and county economic development corporations that we establish a crowd funding site to take advantage of the rule changes, but to date it is bogged down in political considerations. If anyone wants to help me implement my business plan to make something like this happen locally to assist local businesses create more jobs, please contact me at ranzini@university-bank.com.
Stephen Lange Ranzini
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 3:45 p.m.
@snark12: I agree that loosing the restrictions on raising capital could cause problems however the crowd funding sites will be regulated and must have a vetting process and not just allow junk to be sold. Like any investment bank, if they sell junk, investors will rate them as crooks and stop investing through them. So, the crowd funding sites will have a strong incentive to carefully vet investments they allow to be sold through their firm websites.
snark12
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 3:22 p.m.
I'm a fan of Obama but I think the JOBS Act can make the issues related to Groupon's shady accounting and its IPO look boring by comparison. It's great to give small businesses easier access to capital but I think many small investors will be hurt because they don't understand the businesses they're investing in.
Kai Petainen
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 11:43 a.m.
"I have proposed to each of Ann Arbor SPARK, and the city and county economic development corporations that we establish a crowd funding site to take advantage of the rule changes, but to date it is bogged down in political considerations." That is a great idea.
Jay Thomas
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 10:48 a.m.
I am disturbed that we subsidize startups that are frequently bought out and shipped away. Any plan to deal with that?
Jay Thomas
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 3:22 p.m.
This is a Michigan conference so I'm not just talking about Ann Arbor but state-wide. Locally, the demise of Handylab is what I was thinking of: http://www.annarbor.com/business-review/handylabs-demise-in-ann-arbor-october-campaign-issue-for-rick-snyder/
Ben Freed
Wed, Jun 12, 2013 : 1:09 p.m.
Jay, I'm not sure which startups you are referring to. Ann Arbor actually has a decent track record of keeping startups here once they have made their exits (i.e. Arbor Networks, Accuri Cryometers, Health Media, ect.)