You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Mon, Aug 6, 2012 : 7:24 p.m.

Judge orders affidavit to see how evidence was destroyed in dogfighting case

By John Counts

Officials inadvertently destroyed a recording that could have been used as evidence against the Ypsilanti Township man accused of selling dogs for the purpose of fighting.

A recording of Gayland Tomlin, 28, allegedly trying to sell ‘dogfighting’ puppies to an undercover Humane Society officer in February was ruined in the process of trying to enhance the sound quality, it was revealed during a motion hearing in the Washtenaw County Trial Court Monday.

Since the prosecution can’t provide the evidence - a necessary step in the discovery phase leading up to the trial, which is set for September - Tomlin’s public defender Stephen Adams made a motion to dismiss the case.

Judge Melinda Morris, however, neither granted nor denied the motion. She instead ordered a 14-day adjournment so the Humane Society officer responsible for the recording can write an affidavit to see how the mishap occurred.

There is a discrepancy over which agency should have been given the recording. Whereas the prosecution and defense thought the officer was going to give it to someone at the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office, the officer instead gave it to an information technology specialist at the Humane Society of Huron Valley.

“It may have been a miscommunication between myself and the officer,” said Assistant Washtenaw County Prosecutor Paul Barnett, who explained he had an informal conversation with the officer in passing and thought he instructed her to send the “illegible recording” to the sheriff’s office.

But instead, it was given to the IT specialist and destroyed at an indeterminate time, according to both the prosecution and defense.

Barnett said losing the recording was “regrettable,” but that they have other evidence to use against Tomlin, including eyewitness testimony.

Undercover officers from the Humane Society and the sheriff’s office made contact with Tomlin via Facebook last winter. The officers went to Tomlin’s home in the 1300 block of Nash Avenue in Ypsilanti Township and purchased a pit bull puppy, cruelty investigator Elise Ramsey testified at a preliminary examination in May.

At that time, Tomlin allegedly attempted to demonstrate the dog’s fighting ability for Ramsey and an undercover deputy from the sheriff’s office. Authorities serving a search warrant in February found two dogs - one of which was the mother of the puppy Tomlin allegedly attempted to sell the undercover officers - which were so aggressive they needed to be euthanized. The puppy and its sibling have since been given new homes through adoption.

Morris agreed there was "other evidence of this crime," but ordered the affidavit to see exactly what became of the recording.

Comments

nickcarraweigh

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 5:51 p.m.

An "illegible" recording seems to be the sole reason charges are pressed. Nobody can understand the recording, however, since it's "illegible", so probably you could never draw any kind of conclusion from whatever is, or is not, said on the tape. But that doesn't matter anyway, because the tape no longer exists. Philip K. Dick, or Lewis Carroll?

Ron Granger

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 3:15 p.m.

"The dog ate my recording!!"

SonnyDog09

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 2:33 p.m.

If destroying evidence is a crime, and no one is above the law, why haven't charges been brought against the person that destroyed the recording?

Ron Granger

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 4:18 p.m.

Some people can't be bothered to understand what criminal intent is. And I can't be troubled to bother explaining it.

SonnyDog09

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 3:39 p.m.

Great. I'll be sure to tell the cops that I didn't destroy the evidence, I merely damaged it to the point that it became unusable. I'm sure that a mere citizen will get the same benefit of the doubt that the dude from the government is getting. Why is it that it is never a criminal act when it is done by a government employee?

Ron Granger

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 3:14 p.m.

Did you read the article? It was damaged during an attempt at making it audible. It was not a criminal act.

mermaid72

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 12:18 p.m.

Can someone explain how dog fighters can sleep at night? How do they rationalize such cruelty to a living creature?

noshopadopt

Wed, Aug 8, 2012 : 10:55 p.m.

I think they sleep just fine, which makes it even more horrific. Hopefully when they sleep during their 'dirt nap', they'll find out what horror really is.

Gorc

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 10:38 a.m.

"Information technology specialist"? The Humane Society always tries to raise money because their financial budgets are always tight relative to their expenses. I find it difficult to believe that they have an "information technology specialist" on staff due to budget constraints. Did the prosecutor make up that title in order to try save face?

Ron Granger

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 12:34 a.m.

This should be an interestng story. Sound recovery "101" is to make a copy first (and a backup) and never, ever, modify the original. There are also basic evidentiary requirements and best practices.

Pickforddick

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 12:01 a.m.

Fire the person responsible for this.

Dog Guy

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : midnight

Nixon is responsible for the erasure.

Gregory Dodd

Tue, Aug 7, 2012 : 2:02 p.m.

"Sinister forces" are responsible (Alexander Haig).