You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Sun, May 5, 2013 : 5:58 a.m.

Dexter continues exploring cityhood as Tuesday election nears

By Tom Perkins

Voters will go to the polls Tuesday, May 7 to decide whether the village of Dexter should continue down the path to cityhood.

It’s the first time residents there have had the chance to express their preference on cityhood through an election.

Jim Smith, who formed the Committee to Keep Dexter a Village, said he believes that’s an opportunity residents welcome.

“Throughout the whole process there has been nothing that people could say that would have stopped them from doing this,” Smith said. "This is our first opportunity to say 'OK we want you to know how we feel.' People feel like ‘Yeah it’s time to vote on this.’ ”

Cityhood proponents say the village of Dexter already provides its core services and could reduce costs of paying for elections and assessing by $225,000 while eliminating a layer of government. Scio and Webster Townships currently provide those services.

Dexter_Sign.jpg

A yard sign urging residents to vote against cityhood in Dexter.

Tom Perkins | For AnnArbor.com

Smith said remaining a village and township would help retain a small-town feel and sense of community. He said the village pays relatively little in taxes to the townships and government wouldn’t be as simplified as proponents suggest.

Residents AnnArbor.com spoke with in downtown Dexter almost all expressed two of the same thoughts when weighing in on the proposal. They feared cityhood would lead to growth that would “turn Dexter into Ann Arbor”, and they said they didn’t hear clear reasons from proponents on why cityhood is a good idea.

Those who said they didn't have information said they favored not changing anything if they couldn’t find a good reason for cityhood.

“I’m not up to key with the benefits of becoming a city instead of staying a village,” said Peter Theocharakis, owner of Dexter's Pub. But he added he doesn’t feel strongly against it.

The Committee To Keep Dexter a Village has been meeting weekly at the Foggy Bottom Coffee Shop and held several other meetings in the community. Smith said the group's message has been well received.

“A lot of people are very happy that we’re telling the other side of story,” he said. “We seem to have gathered a lot of support. We figure there is a very quiet, silent majority of people who want to stay a village.

“I feel very good about the amount of support we’ve gotten,” he said.

But Village President Shawn Keough said he has heard strong support for continuing the process to cityhood.

If the yes vote wins on May 7, the Boundary Commission orders that an election be held to elect a Charter Commission, a nine-member group who will write the governing document for the new city. That election could take place as soon as November 2013.

That document must then be approved by the Michigan attorney general, after which voters in Dexter would vote on whether to accept the document. If Dexter voters approved the document, the village would officially become a city.

Keuogh said the “vast majority” of residents he spoke with about the issue during his re-election campaign in the fall supported taking the next step to cityhood. He said he has also been speaking to a variety of community groups, and added that the village has information on its website and has sent out mailers.

Keough said the drafting and reviewing of a city charter is the portion of the cityhood process during which residents get to participate most and would provide a chance for residents to compare being a city and village side by side.

“If they vote no, they don’t get to see that part of the process,” he said. “I would encourage people to be open minded to let that process play out. We’ve invested a lot of time and a little bit of money to have a great opportunity in front of us. To say no now - it seems like the wrong time.”

Resident Karen Wilson said she wasn’t totally sold on cityhood, but said she felt strong enough about examining a city charter that she would vote yes on May 7.

“There’s no reason not take a closer look after this much work has been done on it,” she said.

The cityhood process began in 2006.

But Mill Creek Sports Center owner Ray Croske said he feared that the change would lead to bigger government and municipal growth.

“I’m anti-big government and don’t see any advantages to becoming a city,” he said. “Large government tends to waste money and screw things up, so I just don’t see an advantage."

“We’re perfectly happy the way we are,” Croske added.

Read the full ballot language on the county's website.

Tom Perkins is a freelance reporter. Contact the AnnArbor.com news desk at news@annarbor.com.

Comments

ArgoC

Mon, May 6, 2013 : 7:54 p.m.

I wish the article had spent more time on the practical issues instead of the mushy emotions around the words "village" and "city." For example, what exactly would cause Dexter, as a "city", to suddenly not have a small town feel or a sense of community? I don't get it.

Justthinkin

Mon, May 6, 2013 : 11:51 a.m.

Mill Creek Sports Center is NOT included in the Village and it will not impact them at all. If they were in the Village I am sure they would support the next steps in city hood to reduce their overall taxes for both real and personal property. Vote YES on May 7th to support the next steps in city hood. Let the residents decide if there is any benefit to becoming a city when the city charter is written. The next steps after a YES vote is to elect a 9 person charter committee and then we get to vote again on the charter.

amaizinblu

Sun, May 5, 2013 : 9:01 p.m.

It seems people still don't understand that a yes vote on Tuesday means only that we continue the process and get to evaluate the pros and cons down the road as we look at what a city charter would look like. A yes vote does not mean we become a city. I say vote yes and let's compare. Growth (or not) can occur whether we are a city or a village. Taxes can go up or down whether we are a city or a village. In either case we can still vote on that in the future. I believe we need to look at all the facts before we just vote no and end it without really looking into it and not just go on a gut feeling.

Shawn Letwin

Sun, May 5, 2013 : 5:29 p.m.

The process to get to a vote has taken several years, over $60,000 of taxpayer monies and 3 submissions by some of the "leaders" of the village to finally submit to the state what was minimally needed to have the village move to the next step of city hood ( which seemed to be driven by a desire of a few). May be a confidence builder for some, but... Some of these same people will then lead the efforts in the next part of the process if this vote passes...hmmmm? Too bad more money is needed to be spent to support this election instead of waiting till November when the expense is either entirely covered by the State and Federal elections or lowered by sharing election costs of the county and other government entities. Other than some money being saved, the biggest gain could quite possibly be for some of the village leaders not having to work cooperatively with a shared vision amongst the townships that the village currently resides in. I recall the conflict with Webster Township last year at Gordon Hall regarding special use permits and what not. My other question is: how many soft costs in materials, internal labor, outside contractor services, etc. will there be (conversion of all legal documents, files, databases, signage, letterhead, brochures, etc.)? What projected savings there may be from not paying two tax bills may be needed to address the many soft costs at the onset and forward.

Michael

Sun, May 5, 2013 : 1:26 p.m.

Ray Croske said "I'm anti-big government and don't see any advantages to becoming a city". Obviously he doesn't understand that as a Village, he is paying more in taxes and paying for two levels of services from two different communities. Becoming a city does not mean you are necessarily going to grow. It simply states that the city is now in control of all services, which is a cost SAVINGS (something conservatives should like) to the city and the residents. How does it even make sense to have to pay taxes to both the Village and the Township? It doesn't. Villages in Michigan do not make any sense (neither do Charter Townships, but that's another point). There should be a law passed in Michigan that dissolves Village government as well as township government. Residents should only either reside in a city or in the county.

YpsiGirl4Ever

Sun, May 5, 2013 : 4:18 p.m.

Michael, If Dexter choose to remain a Village so be it. As for Townships, a majority of residents in Charter Townships would NOT prefer to live in a "City" or be a part of the "County". Townships normally have lower taxes and are not for the most part rolling in debt (and EFM threats) like cities far and wide Michigan are currently.

Peggysue

Sun, May 5, 2013 : 2:54 p.m.

Take a look at Chelsea!?