You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Tue, May 7, 2013 : 11:50 p.m.

Dexter residents vote to continue cityhood process

By Tom Perkins

The village of Dexter will continue on the path toward cityhood.

According to unofficial results from the Washtenaw County Clerk’s Office, voters Tuesday approved a yes or no question about continuing the seven-year-old process by a margin of 460 to 408, or 53 percent to 47 percent.

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for ELECTION_polling.jpg

Dexter voters on Tuesday approved continuing the cityhood process.

The vote is the first time residents there have had the chance to express their preference on the cityhood process through an election.

Village Council President Shawn Keough said the results shows residents are open-minded and feel it’s worthwhile to continue to exploring cityhood.

“I am very thankful there were enough voters throughout the village that saw the merits of evaluating cityhood,” Keough said. “Over the next year or so, I look forward to electing a charter commission and working with the public to draft a charter for all residents to consider.”

“People who I saw today came out because they felt it’s important to support the process and a lot are sold on cityhood being a good thing,” he added.

The next step is for residents to elect a Charter Commission, a nine-member group that will write the governing document for the new city. That election could take place as soon as November 2013, which means those who wish to be a part of it would have to declare their candidacy by August.

That draft must then be approved by the Michigan Attorney General, after which voters in Dexter would vote on whether to accept the document. If Dexter voters approve it, the village would officially become a city.

Jim Smith, who formed the Committee to Keep Dexter a Village, said he was disappointed with the results and wished there was higher turnout, but said he was proud of his team that assembled to educate voters on their stance on the issue.

“We’ll just keep watching and see what comes up in the draft of the charter,” he said. “I’m sure I’ll be weighing in on that and we’ll see how things unfold as we go forward.”

Residents in the Scio Township precinct voted against the measure by a margin of 373 to 336. But in the Webster Township precinct, where voter turnout was higher, the question was approved 124 to 35.

Residents in Webster Township currently pay higher taxes than those in Scio Township. If Dexter became a city, Webster residents would see their taxes decrease by approximately 3 mills compared to approximately 1.5 mills for those in Scio.

Cityhood proponents say the village of Dexter already provides its core services and it could reduce costs of paying for elections and assessing by $225,000 while eliminating a layer of government. Scio and Webster townships currently provide those services.

Smith previously said remaining a village would help retain a small-town feel and sense of community. He said the village pays relatively little in taxes to the townships and government wouldn’t be as simplified as proponents suggest.

Residents who spoke with AnnArbor.com a week prior to the vote expressed concerns that the cityhood would spur development. Several residents said they didn’t want Dexter to become another Ann Arbor and had not heard any clear reason to support cityhood.

Other changes that would occur if Dexter becomes a city include that city residents will no longer be able to vote for township offices and ballot questions, and all personal property taxes will be collected by the city and then distributed appropriately to the schools, county, etc.

Tom Perkins is a freelance reporter. Contact the AnnArbor.com news desk at news@annarbor.com.

Comments

shepard145

Thu, May 16, 2013 : 12:04 a.m.

Always amusing to see small town politics at work. It appears those who insist Dexter remain a village are far short on truth when it comes to expressing their argument. The claims that moving from a village to city organization causes taxes to increase, development to boom and small town feel to be lost are absurd lies that would never hold up if Mr Smith and his posse were required explain themselves. To think that Mr Smith appears to hold a seat on their council and spouts this nonsense should be disturbing to many who live there. Why not try the truth – that you oppose change of any kind? Those that may be long past retirement, live in little bungalows near town and pay little taxes are more then happy feeding off the community's businesses and new subdivision's taxes. They are perfectly happy with the minimal taxes they pay now and have zero concern or sympathy for those with homes or businesses who could save thousands every year. Tell your Village the truth about your selfish, convoluted opinions Mr Smith.

Doug

Wed, May 8, 2013 : 7:32 p.m.

Be parepared for much higher taxes!

shepard145

Thu, May 16, 2013 : 12:07 a.m.

Be prepared for a good schooling.

UpperDecker

Wed, May 8, 2013 : 3:07 p.m.

Dexter might get its big boy pants on soon.

Just Be Nice

Wed, May 8, 2013 : 1:29 p.m.

"Residents in the Scio Township precinct voted against the measure by a margin of 373 to 336. But in the Webster Township precinct, where voter turnout was higher, the question was approved 124 to 35." You may want to check your math on this? I come up with 709 total votes in Scio and 159 in Webster. That would make voter turnout higher in Scio. What this very close vote tells me is that there are many residents who are not sold on the idea of cityhood. Tax savings will be very minor. So $225,000 could be saved on elections and assessing. Is that actual savings after figuring the cost to hire someone to handle elections and assessing? I am still not convinced that cityhood is an appropriate step for Dexter. Keep Dexter a Village!

shepard145

Thu, May 16, 2013 : 12:06 a.m.

It should tell you that Dexter residents favor moving forward with Cityhood. Your biased attempt at understanding of the voting results is wrong.

John Hansen

Wed, May 8, 2013 : 12:46 p.m.

Great! It is not often that you get a chance to draft your own guiding document. This gives us an opportunity to shape our future rather than be shaped by it. And, it gives the residents a chance to evaluate a proposed charter on its merits rather than on vague rumors of what it might contain. Personally, I hope the new charter calls for a lot of smiling and nodding along with all of those things that we can do better together than we can do alone.

Ann English

Wed, May 8, 2013 : 4:54 p.m.

I know Webster Township part of Dexter is growing; the Methodist church on Huron River Drive, the Carriage Hills subdivision, the York and Noble Streets subdivision; all were not there in 1996, when I got acquainted with Walsh Road and the subdivision off its west end. Had no idea that Dexter extended that far north, so close to Strawberry Lake Road. You think Dexter could nip burglary in the bud by becoming a city? I know that 5-man burglary took place in a subdivision off Huron River Drive, not too far south of North Territorial Road.

Justthinkin

Wed, May 8, 2013 : 11:56 a.m.

What a great day for Dexter! Congratulations and good luck on cityhood, it's another step in a long journey and at the end of the road will be lower taxes and independence.