You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Tue, Jul 3, 2012 : 3:14 p.m.

Dexter Community Schools increases facility rental fees; pay-to-participate fees are likely next

By Danielle Arndt

Editor's note: The date of Dexter's next school board meeting has been corrected in this story.

The Dexter Board of Education approved increasing the district’s facility rental rates by between $5 and $60 per hour, depending on the building and activity, the Dexter Leader reported Tuesday.

The decision was made Monday at the board’s regular meeting, with President Larry Cobler, Vice President Michael Wendorf and Trustee Bonnie Everdeen absent. A slight increase to school lunch prices also was approved, said Superintendent Mary Marshall.

Dexter High School 2004.JPG

It will now cost more for the community to rent Dexter High School for non-school athletic events and activities.

AnnArbor.com file photo

Marshall told AnnArbor.com the district was required to raise lunch prices to meet new federal mandates, so the district does not expect to be bringing in any additional revenue from the increase. Recently-passed legislation changed how federal subsidies for free and reduced lunch students could be disbursed, leading to the increase, Marshall said.

Dexter students now will pay 25 cents more per meal, increasing the price of an elementary lunch to $2.50 and a middle or high school lunch to $2.75. Marshall said the district has not increased lunch prices since 2005.

Re-evaluating athletic facility and building rental fees is part of the district’s effort to develop a more sustainable fee structure that better subsidizes the district’s community education and athletic department costs.

A proposal to increase pay-to-participate fees for high school sports from $100 per sport also is on the table and will be voted on at the school board’s July 30 meeting. Currently, athletics, excluding administrative costs, accounts for about $585,000 of the district’s $34 million operating budget. The district would like to get to a place where athletics are nearly self-funded, Marshall said.

“We have always focused our fiscal resources on the classroom to the greatest degree that we can,” Marshall said. “And while we believe that athletics and extracurricular activities are a wonderful complement (to academics), we are trying to find a way we can fiscally maintain the quality of programming that we have had in extracurricular activities by looking at the fee structure so we don’t get into a position of having to look at cuts and reductions.”

As part of re-evaluating athletics and community education, Dexter is once again separating the departments. The school board approved hiring a new community education director at Monday’s meeting at a starting salary of $50,000, according to board documents.

Also according to board documents, the current cost to rent Dexter High School’s gym is $60 per hour, $40 per hour for nonprofit groups. The average high school gym costs between $40 and $98 to rent at other schools in the area. The new fee structure approved Monday will bring Dexter’s rates closer to competing districts, Marshall said.

She said the district did need to reduce staff by about 6.5 teachers to balance its budget for 2012-13. The reduction occurred through attrition, so no layoffs were necessary. However, it will increase class sizes by one student per class, she said. Marshall reported the average kindergarten class currently has a maximum of 25 students, while the average class at the high school has, at most, 33.

Dexter staff agreed to a 20 percent reduction in compensation for coaching or overseeing clubs and activities for students in addition to their regular paid positions. Teachers' health insurance contribution rates also will increase from 10 percent to 15 percent starting in 2012-13, Marshall said.

School officials are projecting about $33.2 million in revenue for fiscal year 2013. They also plan to use about $680,000 of the district’s fund balance or main savings account to balance the budget, as well as an additional $330,000 in fund equity to implement all-day kindergarten, as the state now requires for full per-pupil funding.

Previous story: Dexter schools: Separating athletics, community service departments to save up to $20K

Staff reporter Danielle Arndt covers K-12 education for AnnArbor.com. Follow her on Twitter @DanielleArndt or email her at daniellearndt@annarbor.com.

Comments

Barbara Read

Thu, Jul 5, 2012 : 7:16 p.m.

If you'd like to watch the pay to participate discussion from Monday's meeting, you can watch it at marker 20:48 at this link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2CUzkR-3ho. I've been videotaping the meetings and putting them online for community members who are unable to attend, but like to follow school news. If you are interested in previous school board meetings, just go to youtube and search "schoolboardonline" to find them.

Laura Jones

Wed, Jul 4, 2012 : 10:39 p.m.

I understands the need for cost controls. but I must disagree with raising the rates for athletics as much as proposed. A family with two kids in athletics will be asked to pay $750, which is not "competitive" with other districts charges no matter how much the board says it is. In a tough economy, that is a lot of money for many families who will also not qualify for assistance. The option for them becomes simple; don't play. In a society that rags daily on kids to "get active" because studies show it helps raise their academic achievement, mental health and physical health, this seems like a very bad move for Dexter and very unwise.

Barbara Read

Thu, Jul 5, 2012 : 3:50 p.m.

I agree. The flip-side of pay to participate is "don't pay; don't participate." I know there's a budget crunch in athletics and I understand that the school board needs to save its money for academics, but this is too high, too fast and without a safety net for the regular families. There will be a reduced fee for the poorest families, but there is no consideration at all for families in the middle who are stuck with a really tough choice, and I'm afraid that there will be fewer kids in sports once the fees more than triple. More troubling is the fact that the board wants this settled ASAP, so it's in place for the fall; but it's still not clear how it's going to turn out or how the students or athletics department will actually be affected. I worry that the rush to make a decision will negatively affect the eventual outcome.

Doug

Wed, Jul 4, 2012 : 3:04 p.m.

The experiences my grandsons have had, both academically and athletically, coming up through the Dexter School system are outstanding. I have been involved in education, outside the Dexter system, for many years and find the Dexter schools to be among the best in the state.

just a voice

Wed, Jul 4, 2012 : 9:25 a.m.

I would be interested in learning more about the fund raisers that are done for schools and their athletic departments. When parents are asked to purchase food products (like frozen stuff, or cookie mixes, etc), who makes the lion share of the money. They aren't non-profits doing that so does that mean someone is making more money then the schools off of that. I know it's not exactly related to this article, but at least related. I know at one point someone was selling advertisements on water bottles that would then be sold by a school team to raise money, and the numbers just didn't seem right. Are schools getting the wool pulled over their eyes with some of these fundraisers.

Barbara Read

Thu, Jul 5, 2012 : 3:43 p.m.

In my experience, the money goes straight to the team. The fundraisers are parent organized.

all-blue

Tue, Jul 3, 2012 : 10:26 p.m.

" Marshall said. "And while we believe that athletics and extracurricular activities are a wonderful complement (to academics), Maybe if Miss Marshall looked at Athletics in a different way ( AS SOMETHING IMPORTANT) Dexter wouldn't be so bad in so many sports. The kids want to win, the community wants to win. But no, its enough to just compete with schools like Chelsea and win once every 15 years. As long as our facilities are somewhat comparable, and our teams are somewhat competitive, life is good with our superintendent. Seems to me, someone had a bad experience, or no experience in Athletics in school! Other districts spend a lot of money on athletics and there students benefit from it. Whats the problem in Dexter? Maybe it's at the top!

Barbara Read

Thu, Jul 5, 2012 : 3:41 p.m.

SemperFi, good point. Also, don't forget track and cross country.

Laura Jones

Wed, Jul 4, 2012 : 10:42 p.m.

Dexter has a rich and winning tradition in so many other (and less costly) sports than football, perhaps we could agree to redefine your remarks about losing seasons to the football team? Personally, I would not want to invest more money in football, which serves so few students at such great cost. Better to put the same money into the winning sports which have been and continue to be a great success.

SemperFi

Wed, Jul 4, 2012 : 3:24 a.m.

"Dexter wouldn't be so bad in so many sports." I'm sorry, but you must be refering to football. I believe that Dexter just had excellent seasons in girls soccer & boys baseball. They both played deep in the playoffs. The young lacrosse team is doing great. The swim team has multiple conference championships and finished high in the state meet. There are many more sports that excell, like equestrian and basketball. It sounds llike the costs are being examined and choices are being made so that they'll be able to offer these sports in the future. Perhaps they should start charging for things like performing arts.

Wondering

Wed, Jul 4, 2012 : 1:45 a.m.

My children are in Dexter schools and I have been impressed with the amount of middle school athletics that are available. Many districts do not have middle school sports, and if they do there is no bus transportation. I understand wanting to win but my children have learned that winning is not everything. They are learning how to work as a team which will help them in the adult lives and careers, not so sure about the "let's win" attitude.

GoNavy

Tue, Jul 3, 2012 : 7:46 p.m.

Teacher benefits cost money - we need to find it somewhere. Thus, the teaching profession here has decided that the use of its monopolistic powers to extract money from their "customers" is the best way to keep things going.

Doug

Wed, Jul 4, 2012 : 2:54 p.m.

GoNavy must have had some bad experiences in school.

SemperFi

Wed, Jul 4, 2012 : 3:06 a.m.

Navy, what are you talking about? Never mind.

Ralph

Tue, Jul 3, 2012 : 10:09 p.m.

That's a rather odd and creepy comment.