You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Fri, May 11, 2012 : 9:10 a.m.

Climate Change: Can we all get behind the solar panel?

By Wayne Baker

0511 ov solar panel array.jpg
Editor's note: This post is part of a series by Dr. Baker on Our Values about core American values. This week Dr. Baker is discussing climate change and American attitudes.

We seem hopelessly divided when it comes to beliefs about global warming. Can we find any areas of agreement?

We began this week by looking at The Alarmed and The Dismissive, the two extreme groups when it comes to attitudes about global warming. Four other categories are between these two, varying in their degree of concern. Majorities of most groups are uncertain about their beliefs, however, and could easily change their minds on the matter. Extreme tactics—like putting Ted Kaczynski and his belief in global warming on a billboard—might change a few minds, but the main effect has been to alienate a lot of people.

Despite varying opinions about global warming, there are some areas of agreement. Clean energy is one of them, according to a March 2012 report from the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Almost eight of ten (79%) of Americans say we should fund more research on clean energy. Support is higher among Democrats and Independents than it is among Republicans—but here’s a surprise—three-quarters of Republicans support funding more research on renewable energy sources.

Similarity, large majorities of all political persuasions support giving tax rebates to Americans who buy solar panels and fuel-efficient cars. Majorities of all parties support regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant.

So, amid all the dissension, divide, and rough tactics, we can find some emerging areas of consensus.

Are you surprised by this consensus?

What measures do you support?

More funding for renewable energy?

What have you done personally, if anything, to reduce your carbon footprint?

Dr. Wayne E. Baker is a sociologist on the faculty of the University of Michigan Ross School of Business. Baker blogs daily at Our Values and can be reached at ourvaluesproject@gmail.com or on Facebook.

Comments

Superior Twp voter

Fri, May 11, 2012 : 3:15 p.m.

"Majorities of all parties support regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant." Huh? What? Have to pay taxes to exhale? Utter nonsense. Get behind solar panels made in China? Nope.

David Briegel

Fri, May 11, 2012 : 3:10 p.m.

You are both right. America prefers to purchase solar panels from the central planning of Communist China which subsidizes the industry to the tune of 30 billion and builds them with child labor, slave labor, prison labor etc. You know, OUR values! While America plays politics over a 500 million dollar problem. Just more American Exceptionalism! The waste of money is allowing China to steal our industry since they are clearly the victors of Ronnie The First's Cold War!

Unusual Suspect

Fri, May 11, 2012 : 2:32 p.m.

"Support is higher among Democrats and Independents than it is among Republicans—but here's a surprise—three-quarters of Republicans support funding more research on renewable energy sources." It's only a surprise if you believe the noise about conservatives wanting dirty water and lots of pollution, which apparently and author has fallen for. It's not a surprise that we are for research on renewable energy sources. This is because the current sources are a waste of money. More research is needed to find out how we can create efficient and reliable alternate energy sources. So, yeah, research is great. No surprise there. Wasting money on the current money-pits isn't.

tdw

Fri, May 11, 2012 : 2:04 p.m.

Nope