You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Sun, Jan 23, 2011 : 6 a.m.

Local governments and schools need to embrace consolidated services

By Tony Dearing

The state of Michigan faces enormous challenges in balancing its budget in the coming year. Local governments do as well.

What we’re hearing far more of these days is an acknowledgment that these budget problems are structural, and the only way to solve them is for government to look and act differently than it does today.

We heard it from Ann Arbor City Administrator Roger Fraser earlier this month when he asked City Council members, “If we can’t afford to do everything we have been doing, what is it we’re willing to modify?’’

Gov. Rick Snyder sounded a similar note in his State of the State message last week, when he talked of government as an “unsustainable financial model’’ that must be reformed.

One of the obvious solutions, Snyder suggested, is more consolidation of services among local governments and school districts. To which we say: Amen.

Roger_Fraser_Jan_8_2011.jpg

City Administrator Roger Fraser has told Ann Arbor City Council members they may have to make politically unpopular decisions to address a $2.4 million deficit for 2011-12.

Ryan J. Stanton | AnnArbor.com

Over the past year or so, we have been advocating for more consolidation, and speaking out in support of such efforts when they have occurred. But examples of consolidation remain few and far between, when compared to the opportunities and the potential savings.

One recent example would be consolidation of bus services among school districts in Washtenaw County. Although the goal was for all 10 school districts to participate, only three signed up: Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti and Willow Run.

Between them, Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti had expected to save $3 million through the move. The savings for all districts could have been greater if more had participated. It was disappointing, but not surprising, that more didn’t sign up. Consolidation can be a difficult and controversial move. But it can also be a significant cost-saver.

In these hard financial times, if local governments and school districts still can’t see that, the time has come to prod them more forcefully into consolidation measures.

That is why we welcome the governor’s call on Wednesday night to reshape state revenue-sharing in ways that reward entities that “adopt best practices,’’ such as service consolidation. We look forward to more details from the governor on that, and hope to see them in the budget he presents in mid-February.

A restructuring of revenue-sharing was one of many concepts that Snyder offered during his first State of the State message. But there is still much in the way of specifics that he needs to provide, particularly in the broad areas of tax reform and education. Until the governor more fully lays out his new policies, we are reserving judgment.

But even at this point, we welcome his call for true fiscal reform for local government and schools. The need couldn’t be any more obvious or urgent.

At a budget retreat earlier this month, Ann Arbor City Council members discussed a variety of drastic measures that might be needed to eliminate a $2.4 million deficit projected for the 2011-12 fiscal year. The ideas range from selling a fire station to imposing a city income tax.

And yes, service consolidations are on the table as well. Given the direness of the city’s financial situation, council is being asked to consider a more regional approach to construction and rental housing inspections, and more regional cooperation on police and fire services. Police Chief Barnett Jones suggested to council that Washtenaw County could become a “leader in Michigan’’ by taking such an approach.

Two weeks later, the Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners listened as County Administrator Verna McDaniel told them that “we know we have a deep and structural deficit, which we know we must repair.’’

In the county’s case, the depth of that deficit has been estimated at $20.9 million over the next two years, which board Chairman Conan Smith, D-Ann Arbor, said “probably means elimination of departments.’’

These kinds of budget discussions are playing out across Michigan, and the deficits facing local governments and schools are deep. Years of “kicking the can down the road,’’ as Snyder described it during the campaign and again in his State of the State speech, have not solved the problem. Only fundamental, structural change in government will.

Service consolidations are not the only solution, and they are by no means a panacea. They must be done strategically, and their results must be measured to determine what the actual savings are. When the three local school districts entered into bus consolidation last fall, there were serious glitches. Bringing about this kind of systematic change is not easy.

But the time for such bold change is overdue, and the reluctance of local governments and schools to embrace it cannot continue. Gov. Snyder not only recognizes that, he appears ready to insist upon it. Now he needs to back it up with real dollars that reward those who take the leap and save money by sharing services that they are needlessly duplicating right now.


(This editorial was published in today's newspaper and reflects the opinion of the Editorial Board at AnnArbor.com.)

Comments

Lakewood Mom

Tue, Jan 25, 2011 : 2:32 p.m.

I wouldn't say the WISD consolidation bussing has been successful. Money saved for AAPS? Yes. But the treatment and quality of life for the folks who serve in these driving positions? Abominable at this point. Most didn't ever and don't accumulate enough hours to be considered full time, and as I understand, the WISD is contracting out the field trips these folks used to be assigned to fill out their hours and paychecks. A bus employee with a family pays roughly $400 a month of their paycheck to keep their "offered" health insurance. Try that with taxes taken out too. I don't know how these folks manage. Cut more administration and make those left do their jobs properly and morally. Make administrators pay in $400 toward their health care benefits. And districts that shift responsibility to consolidation should follow up to see if they can stomach how their fellow, impacted citizens are being treated from their decision.

limmy

Mon, Jan 24, 2011 : 1:40 p.m.

We definitely need a city income tax. At this point, the private property owners are financing the city for everyone. That is a very out dated, unfair, and ineffective model. I also note that the author does not seem to touch on the huge personnel costs at the city. We are financing a system that allows employees to retire at age 50, receive a very healthy pension and health insurance, and go out and get another full time job. This is not the purpose of retirement pensions. The costs could be cut significantly if employees were vested at age 50 but not able to begin collecting pensions until age 62. If they are tired of their job and want to leave, they can do that without affecting their pensions. This simple change would save the city millions as they (we) are currently paying many, many people NOT to work while simultaneously paying people TO work. Unfortunately, we will never hear this suggestion from inside city hall. That is because they ALL (union and non union) have this perk and no one wants to give it up.

Steve Hendel

Mon, Jan 24, 2011 : 1:14 a.m.

As far as I can tell, it is not consolidation, as such, of busing services which will save Ypsi and AA school districts any $$$, but primarily that the drivers are paid substantially less than before. In other words, consolidation was used as a vehicle to cut wages.

Grant

Sun, Jan 23, 2011 : 4:06 p.m.

Other states have one school district for the whole county. Why can't Michigan do the same? For example: it is senseless for Willow Run, Ypsilanti and Lincoln to remain independent school districts. The Willow run district Board leadership is so poor the district is drowning. One Board for all three districts should exist. The members should be selected based on specific skills which will aid the district, just like companies do.

Hot Sam

Sun, Jan 23, 2011 : 3:55 p.m.

There are almost seven hundred school districts in the State of Michigan. I have yet to hear a logical explanation as to why that number cannot be cut at least in half.

Hot Sam

Mon, Jan 24, 2011 : 2:13 p.m.

Dave,...there is "local control" then there is "out of control"

David Briegel

Sun, Jan 23, 2011 : 8:54 p.m.

You never will besides the silly notion of "local control". Grant is citing a perfect example of the problem! 3 Super, 3 HR Dir, 3 Fin Dir and so on and so on. Sucker taxpayers!

Joel A. Levitt

Sun, Jan 23, 2011 : 11:50 a.m.

I watched and listened very carefully to Governor Snyder promise improved state services at lower costs. Since he made no mention of additional taxes, and since there is no evidence that the Governor can walk on water, I have minimized my losses by selling all of my Michigan municipal bonds.