You are viewing this article in the archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see
Posted on Thu, Nov 1, 2012 : 5:59 a.m.

Part one: Communication across police agencies is key in solving Michigan freeway shooter case

By Rich Kinsey

Communications will be the key to catching the shooter who has been plaguing the I-96 freeway in Oakland, Livingston, Shiawassee, and Ingham Counties. It will not be easy or immediate, but the shooter will be identified—if he has not already been caught by the time this goes to print. Unfortunately the clock is ticking, and as time goes by the probability that more will be injured or even killed is increased.

The investigation into the I-96 shooting incidents involves local police agencies in Oakland, Livingston, Shiawassee and Ingham counties as well as state and federal law enforcement agencies. The use of a multiagency task force is the most effective and efficient way to investigate the series of shootings that have occurred on I-96 in the past month.

Without a task force — with one unified command — each agency would be investigating the crimes from their own standpoint. Work inadvertently would be duplicated, and one agency’s investigation would conflict with another.

Task forces share personnel and resources from contributing agencies and most importantly, they share information. The collection of cases will be solved much more efficiently and quickly by agencies collectively working toward catching the shooter.

At the initial stages of an investigation, information management is a paramount concern. Information coming in from the public in the form of “tips” must be read, evaluated prioritized and then assigned to investigators. The information from the tips must then be placed in a database.

An investigative leader must first read all incoming tips. Computers are great for combing through data and mining key words, phrases, license plates or names, but it takes a human with investigative intuition to make key investigative linkages. That is why only one, or at most two, people should read, prioritize and assign all the incoming tips.

What we did in previous task forces I worked on was place tips in categories. In the old days, the tips would be placed in one of four binders entitled "Named Suspect/Named Source," "Named Suspect/Unnamed Source," "Unknown Suspect/Named Source" and "Unknown Suspect/Unknown Source." Today of course, the categories are similar but the information is placed on computers.

If one suspect’s name comes in on numerous tips, those tips are linked and assigned to one investigator. Obviously numerous tips coming in naming the same individual also make that person a higher priority target of investigation.

From the crude binder systems the highest priority tips come from sources or tipsters who are willing to be identified, recontacted and potentially testify in court as to what they know. The tips that are specific about named individuals from an identifiable source are the most fruitful, highest priority tips.

The least priority is placed on anonymous tipsters giving information on suspects they cannot name. A typical tip in this category would be something like, “You know I saw a guy, who looks like the composite drawing of the suspect, at the Art Fair last year.” Great. The police appreciate all information, but there is next to nothing investigators can do with a tip like that.

Once the tips have been collected, read, analyzed and prioritized, they must be assigned for investigation. One of the most valuable pieces of equipment in a major investigation involving multiple investigators is—drum roll please, but be prepared for a low-tech answer—a huge Dry Erase board.

One of the most innovative, functional, efficient design characteristics of any newly built police station in Washtenaw County that I have seen is in the Eastern Michigan Police Department. In a common area where officers are briefed and complete their reports one whole wall from floor to ceiling—or at least as high as the average human can reach—is a dry erase board.

My buddy “Cannon” at the Sheriff’s office has put dry erase boards on all the walls that did not have television monitors or shelves in one of his command post trailers. He also placed them wherever he could in meeting rooms for investigators.

Dry erase boards are ridiculously handy and really keep everyone in the loop and involved. These boards assign tasks and responsibilities to investigators and tell other cops, at a glance, who is investigating what or whom.

The efficiency comes from the fact that as investigators talk to one suspect, they might learn valuable information about another suspect. Instead of just placing the information in their report and hoping it gets to the person who needs the information, investigators can look on the board and see who needs the information.

The investigator with the information can then walk over to the other officer’s desk or make a cellphone call to pass on the information. That takes much less time, than typing or dictating a report and trusting it will get to someone who needs the information.

If an investigator is having a specific problem or is looking for someone they can write their request on the board so other detectives can help. Everyone in the investigation can look at the board and see who others are looking for or who is no longer a suspect and thus unworthy of spending precious time on.

Even while on a phone with a tipster, an investigator can look on the board to have questions answered or direct calls to the right person in the investigation. The only downside of information sharing through dry erase boards is when the information can be of a confidential nature, limited access to the area is a necessity.

Information flow between all members of the task force thus easily is established once they are spending at least a portion of the day in this common area. The next hurdle for the task force is effective communication with the public through the media — which I will discuss next week.

Lock it up, don’t leave it unattended, be aware and watch out for your neighbors.

Rich Kinsey is a retired Ann Arbor police detective sergeant who now blogs about crime and safety for



Thu, Nov 1, 2012 : 6:01 p.m.

The problem with the case at the hospital was lawyers stood in the way of the crime from being reported. How do you expect the U-M police to investigate a crime that is not reported?


Thu, Nov 1, 2012 : 2:57 p.m.

Uhm, the U of M incident was a result of the U of M administration, health system administration and office of general counsel putting the kabbash on the investigation. Gotta protect the brand and image ya know.


Thu, Nov 1, 2012 : 11:44 a.m.

I'm not encouraged, considering the total lack of "inter-departmental communication" experienced when the University tried to investigate the recent child pornography case at the hospital. If we're mentioning that communication is key, it's likely because it's bad to begin with. It's like Fox News telling you that they are "fair and balanced." If they have to tell you, they aren't.


Thu, Nov 1, 2012 : 9:29 p.m.

Should say "paint," "...trying to *paint* the entire profession..."


Thu, Nov 1, 2012 : 9:28 p.m.

" That is, a police officer on one side of the country would likely have little trouble fitting into an organization on the other side of the country. " The above could not be farther from the truth. As someone who's been associated with departments in different states, I can assure you that the culture in various parts of the country, differs wildly. Departments in the intermountain West bear close to ZERO resemblance to departments in the East, and even in the Midwest. I think you should stick with the idea that you just don't like, or obviously even understand, law enforcement. Trying to paid the entire profession with one brush doesn't lend much weight to your ideas about what goes on in any particular dept.


Thu, Nov 1, 2012 : 2:59 p.m.

sheepyd: You're right, I'll come out and say it: I'm wary of law enforcement. I disagree with your restaurant contention; a police department is an organization which consists of individuals who are largely fungible across other similar organizations. That is, a police officer on one side of the country would likely have little trouble fitting into an organization on the other side of the country. This is due to the fact that the organization (the "police") share many elements of a common culture. PS I did not try to get a job as a law enforcement officer (I'm college educated, with a respectable degree from a national university), but I was able to secure a job in the military earlier in my life. Furthermore, I am not the sort of individual who regularly comes into contact with law enforcement other words, I'm not a incorrigible recidivist.


Thu, Nov 1, 2012 : 1:03 p.m.

Great Argument, I think it is fair to judge all law enforcement based on the short falls of a campus police department in Ann Arbor. That is kind of like judging all restaraunts based on a bad experience at Denny's. Its obvious as someone who reads daily that you don't like law enforcement, how about you just post that you hate cops everytime you feel compelled rather than trying to make any coherent point. I imagine you tried to get a job as a police officer and failed, probably a psychological issue and now you are taking out your anger on this website. Well played sir, Well played. Have a nice day.


Thu, Nov 1, 2012 : 12:26 p.m.

Having to say your fair and balanced is no more reassuring than MSNBC not saying it.It is obvious to any discerning mind neither of them are impartial. I do have more faith however that sooner or later there will be a citizen with enough good evidence to pass along that will nail the shooter. If it continues.