You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 5:29 a.m.

Thompson Block scaffolding finally comes down; a new international bridge needs to go up

By Tony Dearing

Proposed new international bridge:

Ambassador_Bridge_Matty_Moroun.jpg

Ambassador Bridge

Photo courtesy of VideoVik via Flickr

If you’ve driven over the Ambassador Bridge from Detroit to Windsor anytime recently, you probably concluded what most experts already agree on — that a new bridge is needed. That’s why we continue to support the proposal to build a second international bridge between Detroit and Ontario, and why we’re mildly encouraged to hear Gov. Rick Snyder say that he remains confident a bridge authority will be in place by October to oversee the construction of a new span.

It’s a little baffling to us why this concept hasn’t already made it through the Legislature. Canada is so eager for the proposed New International Trade Crossing bridge that it’s offering to cover all of Michigan’s costs upfront, and to protect the state from any obligation for bonds that will finance the project. Michigan isn’t going to get a better deal than that. The proposal enjoys broad support from business groups and corporations, agricultural interests and labor unions. Four past governors of Michigan - two Democrats and two Republicans - all back this new bridge.

The proposed International Trade Crossing bridge would be located further south and connect directly with Canada’s highway 401, providing a much better flow of traffic across the border.

A drive these days across the Ambassador Bridge makes it obvious how the current span is deteriorating and how much a modern counterpart is needed. The sooner the Legislature approves a new, internationally controlled second bridge, the better. Get it done, lawmakers.

Thompson Block:

Thompson_Block_Aug_2011.jpg

Thompson Block building

Tom Perkins | For AnnArbor.com

We’d be the first to agree it’s taken far too long, but we’re as pleased as anyone to see the scaffolding come down from around the Thompson Block building in Ypsilanti.

It’s been nearly two years since the historic structure in Depot Town was ravaged by a fire, and it could be another two years before the collapsed portion of the building’s east and south end is rebuilt and the roof restored.

Until then, the 148-year-old structure will remain an eyesore. So we understand the frustration and impatience that some city officials and residents have expressed over the Thompson Block saga, which has stretched on for a couple of decades now.

But as we suggested earlier this year, it was in the best interest of both the city and the owner of the property, developer Stewart Beal, to come to some kind of reasonable agreement that made the building structurally safe and removed the bracing and fencing that extended into River Street, interfering with traffic flow.

That has been accomplished and a city inspector has reviewed and approved the work done on the building so far. Only some minor masonry work remains to be done in order for Beal to comply with a consent agreement by the Sept. 2 deadline that he and the city agreed to.

The future of the building remains uncertain. In April, Beal said he’s changed his plans for redevelopment of the former Civil War barracks from a mixed-use concept to a purely residential approach that would feature 23 lofts, ranging in size from 620 to 1,120 square feet.

Beal faces considerable challenges in making this project happen, and yes, he has certainly tested the city’s patience with the amount of time it’s taken him to restore the building to structural soundness following the fire. But this is the best outcome the city could ask for under the circumstances. The building has been stabilized, traffic is no longer being impeded, and Beal now has the opportunity to show that he can turn his vision for the Thompson Block into reality.

(This editorial was published in today's newspaper and reflects the opinion of the Editorial Board at AnnArbor.com.)

Comments

Peter

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 2:20 p.m.

The scaffolding is back up, some large cracks appeared when it was taken down.

Craig Lounsbury

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 12:58 p.m.

"It's a little baffling to us why this concept hasn't already made it through the Legislature." I would say partly because Matty Moroun has deep pockets and buys votes like too many other people with deep pockets do.

belboz

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 12:35 p.m.

We do not need a new international bridge. Canada is a big part of the Trade Deficit. We import many cars and car parts from them. We do not need to make it easier for Canadian's to work in Detroit, or make a bigger dent on the Trade Deficit. It is a long term job loser. Please explain to me how OUR exports are going to go up because of a NEW bridge? They are not. This is why Canada is so willing to spend their money on the bridge. Make no mistake about it. You have been warned.

Basic Bob

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 7:45 p.m.

Sorry, not being a teapartier, I can't answer for them. Having actually worked in a few US and Canadian auto plants, I can tell you that both the UAW and CAW have been more friendly to management in recent years. But government incentives aside, US auto makers would clear out of both Michigan and Ontario in a big hurry if they weren't making money. The reinvestment in both should be a clue.

Edward R Murrow's Ghost

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 5:42 p.m.

BB, Unions in Canada are MUCH stronger than they are here. According to teaparty logic, that equals less productivity. You, however, assert Canadian workers are more productive than in the US. Hmmmmmm. The have socialized medicine. TeaParty logic tells us that that leads to the downfall of our economy and, in the extreme, of personal responsibility. Yet, according to belboz, Canada sells more stuff to us that we do to it, and that building a new bridge will only make that worse. Hmmmmmmmmm. Could someone in Teapartyland explain to all of us how that could be? Good Night and Good Luck

Peter

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 4:38 p.m.

You, of course, have some figures and reports to back up those assertions, right? They're not just totally made up or anything.

Basic Bob

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 3:16 p.m.

@ERMG, Simple answer, productivity. They work harder and make better stuff. The business costs are manageable.

Edward R Murrow's Ghost

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 3:06 p.m.

Gee. Canada with its "socialized" health care system actually imports stuff to the US? I wonder if any of the local teapartyists might explain how that could be so. Good Night and Good Luck

Craig Lounsbury

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 1:02 p.m.

IMO it's naive to think a second bridge between Detroit and Windsor is going to significantly impact trade between Canada and the United States.

Dalex64

Sun, Aug 28, 2011 : 11:13 a.m.

I don't think a new bridge is necessary. What I think is needed is more inspection lanes. There is plenty of space near the existing bridge to build many more lanes. Isn't building an entirely new bridge just an incredibly more expensive way to achieve the same thing?