You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 11:23 a.m.

Rate of handgun permits per capita in Washtenaw County one of the lowest in Michigan

By Amy Biolchini

Washtenaw County has one of the lowest rates of handgun permits per capita in the state, according to a Bridge Magazine report.

According to the publication's analysis of Michigan State Police data from March, handgun permits per-capita are more common in northern and rural counties in Michigan than they area in urban counties.

Gun ownership rates are hard to track in Michigan, as the Michigan State Police track permit applications for concealed handguns, Bridge Magazine reported.

At the opening of the new gun retail shop Ann Arbor Arms at 5060 Jackson Road in October, owner Bill Pinon told AnnArbor.com that Washtenaw County has the highest number of applicants in the state for concealed pistol licenses.

041013_GUN-jpg

Courtesy of Bridge Magazine

Bridge Magazine is a publication of The Center for Michigan and is a partner with MLive.

Amy Biolchini covers Washtenaw County, health and environmental issues for AnnArbor.com. Reach her at (734) 623-2552, amybiolchini@annarbor.com or on Twitter.

Comments

Boo Radley

Thu, Apr 11, 2013 : 1:26 p.m.

This is stupid ... this particular Bridge article shows permits per capita Another article, also in Bridge Magazine lists gun permits by county and lists Washtenaw as ranking #7 in the state for gun carry permits. Another example that you can make statistics say anything you want. It's just unusual to see the same publication do it. BTW, this other article I mention (link below) is headlined "Easier carry permits haven't led to more gun deaths". http://bridgemi.com/2013/04/easier-carry-permits-havent-led-to-more-gun-deaths/

MikeyP

Thu, Apr 11, 2013 : 12:57 p.m.

It's rather simple to understand just based on demographics. Most of the population in Washtenaw are in urban areas which have lower rates of firearms ownership vs. rural areas, while rural areas have lower crime (More Guns, Less Crime as it were). In order to obtain a CPL you need to pay to take a class (which costs around $100 if not more), take the class (8 hours), undergo background checks (going out to the Service Center to get fingerprinted), pay the fees to the state, etc. And all that's before you have to shell out $500 or so for a decent concealed-carry handgun. This pretty much rules out getting a CPL for the young and the urban poor (who don't have the money). The shame is that the urban poor are the very people who can most benefit from having CPLs, they're the primary violent crime targets. I have a CPL, have had it for years. I've also never been robbed, though. Ann Arbor is a safe community, one you have to pay a pretty penny to live in (which isn't a coincidence) but it's worth the cost IMHO. I could afford to take the class, pay the fees and buy a gun. That's what the gun control laws have wrought though... only the people with the lowest odds of being violent crime victims can really afford to get CPLs/guns. I'm a proponent of doing away with CPLs entirely and going the route of Alaska, Vermont and Arizona which have "Constitutional Carry"... you don't need a permit there to carry concealed. I'm also a proponent of eliminating gun-free zones (aka "free fire zones") but that's a bit too much common sense to expect anytime soon. I'm a crime analyst, it's part of my job to look at what works to deter crime. Armed law abiding citizens deter crime, there's no two-ways about it. It isn't the most important factor (the number of police in a given area is actually the most important factor) but it does have a positive effect... and is one of our inherent rights. That's a bit too spot-on for many of the denizens of this coun

G. Orwell

Thu, Apr 11, 2013 : 1:21 a.m.

70 MILLION background checks since Obama took office. People are getting it. I believe even democrats and liberals are packing these days. The elitist and politicians that want to disarm the public while they plan on keeping their semi-autos and armed body guards better not bite off more than they can chew. Gun owners are not going to put up with that crap.

Mike

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 11:50 p.m.

This is good to know if you're a burglar................

stevek

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 9:59 p.m.

Criminals don't bother with such things like permits. People who steal guns don't usually apply for a permit.

Jack Gladney

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 9:58 p.m.

Boy, was this one phoned in. The basis of this article is a 'report' (three brief paragraphs of in-depth analysis) in Bridge Magazine that begins the assertion that household gun ownership is on the decline in the US. That seems like a reasonable assumption to start with... If you live in a hole in the ground. The rest of the report like this article seems to be about concealed carry. I was chided yesterday as being someone expecting to find a byline from Woodward and Bernstein on annarbor.com. I continue to work on lowering my expectations.

walker101

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 8:21 p.m.

Funny as many shootings they have around here you'd think everyone is packing a 38 special, could of fooled me.

Goofus

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 8:18 p.m.

And our violent crime rate is low too...Imagine that!

motorcycleminer

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 6:50 p.m.

I love the " intellegent " sheeple don't own guns remarks ....thats because their so dumbed down as to believe that the wolves will actually protect them ....duh....

Basic Bob

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 7:13 p.m.

Yes, iI thought that was a little naive. There is something to be said for staying away from wolves, even if you do carry a gun.

aduggs

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 6:25 p.m.

Complete rubbish. Intelligent gun owners do not tell others they own a gun, especially not to Gallup, which this article is citing. By the way, the FBI has reported 32 firearm background checks per minute over the last 4 years.

you can't handle the truth

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 5:05 p.m.

So you mean to tell me that all the gangbangers out there aren't following the proper licensing procedures? How can this be?

Bananagunz

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:57 p.m.

What a horribly written article. And the only thing clear in these muddled lines is that the author knows very little about the subject in which she writes. Get some more data and then make a point. And learn the proper terminology. I guess I'd like to see the actual numbers of applicants of each county rather than knowing per capita numbers. Who cares if all eight people in Keneewa own guns? CPL numbers might also be interesting to compare against new applicants as well. I think using only applicants in one given year gives a very inaccurate snap shot of gun ownership in any county. Most of the gun owners I know in Washtenaw have been carrying their guns for years without applying for a thing; just a renewal of their CPL every few years. With all the gun issues out there you'd think A2.com could put out something a bit better.

Dog Guy

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:50 p.m.

So many Washtenaw folks have a multifaceted government-dependency problem. Letting someone else carry a pistol to defend me is only one of a hundred personal failures common to living on tax money from birth to death. It is a wonderful system for me.

Major

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:29 p.m.

More liberal media lies and deception, incorrect terminology and completely inaccurate reporting. Nothing new here! Shooting for 12 vote downs today, come libs you can do it!!

mermaid72

Thu, Apr 11, 2013 : 12:46 p.m.

OK, here's 1 down for you!

Brad

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:10 p.m.

Here are the actual statistics. Draw your own conclusions. Looks to me like there are still roughly 10K people in Washtenaw County licences to pack. http://1.usa.gov/kjBsgh

Brad

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:10 p.m.

"licensed"

Use Logic

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:07 p.m.

It's a bit of a stretch to draw a correlation between urban vs. rural counties. Oakland, Wayne, and Macomb - the three most urban counties in the state - are right at the middle of the list. Genesee is on the top third. Where I do see a stronger correlation is in college counties - Ingham, Isabella, Kalamazoo, of course Washtenaw, and (to my previous point) Houghton are all on the bottom 10. That leads me to believe that age is more of a factor than anything.

Hunterjim

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:07 p.m.

Wow what a poorly written article. The article cited was talking about the number of households who claim to have firearms has dropped. It does not make sense. Firearm sales nationally are at historic highs. Fewer people are admitting to anyone let alone law enforcement that they have firearms in their house, for obvious reasons, it's none of their business! MSP was stating that they can track the number of CPL permits issued per county not the number of LTP's issued. Very inaccurate information.

seldon

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 5:46 p.m.

It's possible for the number of households that have firearms to stay flat or drop while national sales are at historic highs. All it means is that people who do own guns are buying more guns.

Brad

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:17 p.m.

Aggregated junk is still junk.

Cory C

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4 p.m.

So what you're saying is that Washtenaw county has the highest number of applicants, but one of the lowest number of actual holders? Are we denying more people than other counties? Are there more unqualified people being turned down? Could I request that stories are researched more?

Angry Moderate

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 8:47 p.m.

We have a larger population. More applicants, but a lower rate of applications. The ranking is per capita.

Epengar

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 6:18 p.m.

"So what you're saying is that Washtenaw county has the highest number of applicants, but one of the lowest number of actual holders?" No, no one has said that. The only information being given here is the number of permits approved. There's no information being given on number of applicants or rate of approval.

tdw

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 3:38 p.m.

I don't know what they mean.You don't need a permit ( you used to have to get a purchase permit for a handgun but no more as it was just redundant with the federally required background check )to own a handgun.All you have to do ( by state law ) is register it.I can buy one and register it in the U.P and bring it to Washtenaw County and it's totally legal. I now await all the thumbs down to come because I've stated facts

tdw

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:04 p.m.

Hunterjim...Yes I know that.I was just trying to keep it simple

Brad

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:03 p.m.

Aarg. Forgot we're still using 1990s link-handling technology here: http://1.usa.gov/153QTmd

Brad

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4:02 p.m.

I didn't know that but you are correct - thanks. Anyone else wanting to bone up on the new laws: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/msp/Public_Act_377_406542_7.pdf

Hunterjim

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 4 p.m.

TDW, you still need a permit to purchase a pistol from a private individual if you don't have a CPL, you do not need one purchasing from a FFL dealer.

tdw

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 3:53 p.m.

Brad that makes more sense but they got rid of the purchase permit requirement last year.It's covered by the federal background check now

Brad

Wed, Apr 10, 2013 : 3:49 p.m.

The terminology used is quite poor, both in the original article and here. They're talking about Concealed Pistol Licenses, which are called "CPLs", not "gun permits". You do require a permit from the state to purchase a handgun, but that's a different thing entirely.