U.S. Army Corps of Engineers rejects closing Chicago-area locks to block Asian carp
Federal officials on Thursday ruled out closing Chicago-area shipping locks on a regular basis, saying it probably would not stop dreaded Asian carp from invading the Great Lakes but could damage the local economy.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said anything short of permanently closing the two locks was unlikely to make a difference in the battle to prevent the voracious fish from gaining a foothold in Lake Michigan. That alternative will be part of a long-range study of whether to sever ties between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River systems, the Corps said.
The decision after months of study dashed the hopes of Michigan and neighboring states, which have unsuccessfully asked the Obama administration, Congress and the Supreme Court to order immediate closure. Supporters fear the locks will provide an easy path to the lakes for bighead and silver carp, which biologists say could starve out native species and ruin the $7 billion fishing industry.
Illinois government and business leaders resisted, saying closure would cripple Chicago shippers and tour boat operators while costing the local economy $4.7 billion over two decades. They questioned the reliability of DNA evidence suggesting the carp have overrun electronic barriers on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, part of a network of waterways eventually linking the lakes and the Mississippi.
"After rigorous scientific and technical review, it's clear that shutting down Chicago's waterways is not an effective solution," said Rep. Judy Biggert, an Illinois Republican.
Col. Vincent Quarles, commander of the Corps' Chicago district, said the agency considered several scenarios for regularly scheduled lock closures and openings. For example, they could be closed three or four days a week, or every other week.
"In the end, the analysis showed that using measures such as temporary lock closures will do very little to reduce the risk of Asian carp migration," Quarles said.
In two reports issued Thursday, the government promised more modest steps, including completion of a third electronic barrier this year.
The Corps also will place screens near one of the locks, which already has been done at the other, and will study other technologies that could scare away the carp such as placing lights and noisemakers in the waterways, Quarles said.
The Michigan attorney general's office, which has led the push for lock closure, said those measures were too little, too late.
"It's just disappointing seeing things like this being portrayed as real action to confront the Asian carp threat when in reality so much more needs to be done," spokeswoman Joy Yearout said. "It's generating a false sense of security."
Quarles said the locks might be occasionally closed for short periods to assist operations such as the spreading of fish poison in a section of the waterways last month, which killed 100,000 pounds of fish but turned up no Asian carp.
Comments
Cendra Lynn
Fri, Jun 4, 2010 : 1:04 p.m.
Where's Don Guinn when we really need him?
uawisok
Fri, Jun 4, 2010 : 11:41 a.m.
Lets everyone mail Obama and the civil engineers who did such a great job with the levvees around New Orleans a carp in the mail!!!
B. Jean
Fri, Jun 4, 2010 : 10:45 a.m.
Oh yeah, let's protect the Illinois economy and risk economic and ecological devastation to all great lakes states and the Mississippi border states. Yep, another "brilliant" (not) decision by a government organization. Yes people that's our tax dollars at work.
Mick52
Fri, Jun 4, 2010 : 9:36 a.m.
Well, well, well, our cap and tax president who promotes himself as an environmental hero chooses commerce over the environment, in concert with an Illinois republican. This puts his credibility in doubt. Ineffective solution and do little to reduce the risk? I would have liked to have heard from these people why they think this way. Are there many other access points for the carp? It closing the locks helps at all, it should be done.
John of Saline
Fri, Jun 4, 2010 : 8 a.m.
Obama is a Chicago politician. Did you think he'd let his old buddies down by closing the locks?
Rabid Wolverine
Fri, Jun 4, 2010 : 7:43 a.m.
After rigorous scientific and technical review, it's clear that shutting down Chicago's waterways is not an effective solution," said Rep. Judy Biggert, an Illinois Republican --- I am sure the closure of the locks would be very effective. Biggert just doesn't like the affects that come with closing the locks.
81wolverine
Fri, Jun 4, 2010 : 7:23 a.m.
None of us should be surprised here. The Chicago and Illinois governments and industry are just doing what they've always done - exploit and ruin the Lake Michigan watershed for economic gain. When you look at the industrial wasteland along the lake front that spreads from Gary, IN through Chicago, it's no surprise they don't want to close the locks. They can't have nature interfere with a free flow of ships and filth that gets dumped into the canal.
st.julian
Thu, Jun 3, 2010 : 7:42 p.m.
This in hindsight will be another decision with catastrophic results for the great lakes fishery. The government officials will say after the disaster that there was no way of knowing that their half baked politcally motivated solution would not work.
a2tom
Thu, Jun 3, 2010 : 7:13 p.m.
yeah....just what we need,a swift kick while were down. Tour boat operators???really??? close the EFFIN locks already.