• Complete Forecast | Homepage | Site Index | RSS Feeds & Blogs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise

HOME NEWS BUSINESS SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TRAVEL LIVING FORUMS SHOP JOBS AUTOS REAL ESTATE CLASSIFIEDS PLACE AN AD
SEARCH: 

INSIDE SPARTANS
  • MSU Spartans Home
  • Email Steve Grinzcel
  • Gang Green Blog
  • Spartans Podcasts
  • MSU Football Forum
  • MSU Basketball Forum
  • Spartans Forum
  • Spartans Photos
  • Sports Home
  • Browse by day posted:

    Browse by week posted:
    GANG GREEN
  • The end of a short era...
  • Rosenberg: Next year looking better for MSU
  • Next year's goal: Win bowl game
  • LATEST MSU AUDIO
  • Grinczel on WGHN: Morgan starting to fill leadership role
  • Tom Izzo on 'The Huge Show': State of Spartans
  • Steigenga on The Huge Show: Michigan State must contain Lawson to win
  • LATEST MSU PHOTOS
  • Photos: Capital One Bowl -- Georgia 24, Michigan State 12
  • Photos: No. 7 Penn State 49, No. 17 MSU 18
  • Photos: No. 18 Michigan State 21, Purdue 7
  • Big Ten title finally on line with MSU-Penn State

    by Steve Grinczel
    Thursday November 20, 2008, 12:10 AM

    Penn State coach Joe Paterno worked with former Michigan State coach George Perles to begin the year-end tradition.

    EAST LANSING -- George Perles and Joe Paterno were visionaries. They just didn't think it would take 15 years to see the season finale between Michigan State and Penn State achieve the perennial importance of Michigan-Ohio State.

    However, four coaching changes -- all by MSU -- and 14 generally inconsequential regular season finishes later, the Spartans and Nittany Lions are finally playing for a lot more than a bid from a second-tier bowl or self-respect.

    A whole lot more.

    The winner of Saturday's 3:30 p.m. game in State College, Pa., will come away with at least a share of the Big Ten championship.

    A victory will put Penn State in the Rose Bowl.

    A Spartans win, coupled with an Ohio State loss to Michigan in a game that has been relegated to JV status because of the Wolverines' woeful season, will send MSU to Pasadena.

    "Finally, it's a bonanza," said Perles, who left as the Spartans coach in 1994 and is now a member of the Michigan State Board of Trustees. "You would have liked to have seen this come together sooner and it's been a long haul.

    "Year after year after year after year, you'd hear how Ohio State-Michigan means everything and it's the most important game on the schedule. That's changed now."

    In the early '90s, Perles felt Michigan State needed an attractive finishing game that could compete with deer-hunting season and give fans a reason to show up even in bad weather.

    Numerous teams play their biggest rival at the end of the season, but MSU had no chance of creating that scenario with U-M because the hated Wolverines and Ohio State have reservations for the season's last Saturday.

    So when Penn State agreed to join the Big Ten and start competing in football in '93, Perles, who also was the MSU athletic director at the time, seized the opportunity to set up something special against a nationally prominent opponent.

    Penn State had no natural rivals in the conference. Although Pennsylvania and Ohio are border states, the Paterno-coached Lions played the Buckeyes in just three regular-season games from 1966-92.

    Meantime, MSU and Penn State are kindred spirits as the nation's two oldest land grant colleges and legendary Spartans coach Duffy Daugherty hailed from Emeigh, Pa.

    Paterno also knew Perles from his days as a Pittsburgh Steelers assistant coach.

    "He called me up and said, 'Hey, the Big Ten has one game that everybody has locked in at the end of the season, why don't we lock our game in?' " Paterno said. "And I said, 'George, I think that would be great,' because Michigan State has a great Pennsylvania background.

    "I think it's nice, and we've had some good football games."

    Perles and Paterno agreed to make it a trophy game, but the Land Grant Trophy had been about the only thing up for grabs because it has had championship implications only one other time.

    In 2005, Penn State needed a 31-22 victory at MSU to finish 7-1 and tie Ohio State for the title, but the Spartans were only a 5-6 team.

    The closest Michigan State came to making the game relevant to the championship race was 1999, when it beat the Lions 35-28. However, the Spartans ended up tied for second at 6-2 because Wisconsin beat Iowa to finish 7-1.

    One team or the other came out of the game with a losing record 10 times, and MSU and Penn State were both sub-.500 in 2000 and '04.

    The game meant more to the Spartans last season because they needed the 35-31 victory to clinch their first bowl bid in four years.

    Spartans coach Mark Dantonio said former MSU quarterback and current running backs coach Dan Enos filled him in on Perles' hopes and dreams for this game.

    "He said at one point, coach Perles referenced this football game by saying some day, some time, it would be played for the Big Ten championship," Dantonio said. "To do that in 2008 is exciting for all Spartans, and it puts a little more emphasis and credibility on the rivalry."

    It may take 115 more years for MSU-Penn State to catch up in stature to Michigan-Ohio State, but for this season, at least, it's on center stage.

    "It's a big deal right now, and that's what matters," Perles said. "Ohio State and Michigan just have to lick their wounds like we did for so many years. I'm just proud of our team and school that we've got ourself in this position.

    "Is it gratifying it's happening now? Absolutely, and you feel good that you had a vision that this could be a possibility."

    The MSU players Perles will travel with to the game this weekend were babies and toddlers when he pushed his agenda forward, but they're grateful beneficiaries of his foresight.

    "It's great that it's a big deal," senior defensive end Brandon Long said. "The Big Ten championship is on the line, and if they don't win they don't get it, and if we don't win we don't get it.

    "So this is going to be a high-intensity, high-stakes game. It's about time somebody else has stepped up, and I'm glad we can be that team."

    COMMENTS (19)Post a comment
    Posted by BoulderLion on 11/20/08 at 12:49AM

    Your wish came true George, and one is enough.

    Now drop your plans to run for governor.

    Posted by msujd on 11/20/08 at 10:52AM

    Yeah, I love that Big George for governor idea. Ha Ha. I think tater or wmu have a better chance at winning a spot on the MSU Board of Regents than George has of winning as governor.

    Posted by taterrific2 on 11/20/08 at 1:53PM

    So, how do you Spartan fans feel about the prospect of cheering for UM this weeekend?

    I am guessing that if UM wins, it will be sorta like watching your mother in law drive over a cliff: in your totally restored, original parts, cherry-red 1956 corvette with white fins.

    Posted by tecmo101 on 11/20/08 at 2:00PM

    I am not rooting for or against u of m. I only want to see MSU beat PSU, that is the only game I am interested in.

    Posted by taterrific2 on 11/20/08 at 2:01PM

    msujd on 11/20/08 at 10:52AM:
    "I think tater or wmu have a better chance at winning a spot on the MSU Board of Regents than George has of winning as governor."

    Glad to see you guys are thinking about me when I'm not here.

    George and I would be a study in contrasts, though.

    My platform as MSU Trustee: "Tell the academians to keep their noses out of the athletic program and back in their books where they belong. That way, you won't drive the next Nick Saban out of town."

    George's platform as Governor: "Work hard, keep your mouth shut, and good things will happen."

    I like my platform better. Imagine what your program would be like now if the MSU admins hadn't disgusted Saban so badly that he turned into the world's highest-paid pastoral nomad.

    Posted by pero on 11/20/08 at 2:59PM

    Dear Tater,

    I am not worried about a game that U of M simply cannot and will not win. I am only concerned about MSU playing well at Penn State. U of M and OSU is a non-game. End of story.

    Posted by McCloud8504 on 11/20/08 at 3:23PM

    I'll be rooting for every Buckeye mistake made on the field. Interceptions, fumbles, punts...but that's as far as I will go.

    I'll be rooting against the buckeyes, but not for the Wolverines...

    I'm just hoping OSU finds a way to lose this one.

    Posted by SpartanGRH on 11/20/08 at 4:09PM

    taterrific2, I for one will not be cheering for UM. I will thoroughly enjoy the pounding that the Buckeyes will put on your team. My prediction? OSU wins 52-6.

    Posted by gostate96 on 11/20/08 at 4:09PM

    So, how do you Spartan fans feel about the prospect of cheering for UM this weeekend?

    I am guessing that if UM wins, it will be sorta like watching your mother in law drive over a cliff: in your totally restored, original parts, cherry-red 1956 corvette with white fins.

    OK Tater....that was funny!

    Posted by sdp000 on 11/20/08 at 7:06PM

    Grinz, great article!!!

    We really appreciate the effort to give us the history. THANK YOU

    Posted by playboy4561 on 11/20/08 at 7:19PM

    no way will MSU beat PSU,,, they lost by the only 2 decent teams on their weak a$$ schedule

    Posted by fishigan11 on 11/20/08 at 7:20PM

    tater:

    That's a good question, but it would be alot juicier if Michigan had a somewhat decent record this year. At this point it's irrelevant because nobody truely feels that Michigan has a chance so when I watch the game...it will feel like I'm rooting for such an incredible underdog rather than the same ole Michigan. But the Rose Bowl would help the program more than the other two so I'm sure you'll find more Spartan fans rooting for Michigan than you think. Having beaten U of M already this year, in their own dojo, also makes it alot easier to root for them.

    Posted by chevegas on 11/20/08 at 8:28PM

    "playboy4561 on 11/20/08 at 7:19PM

    no way will MSU beat PSU,,, they lost by the only 2 decent teams on their weak a$$ schedule"

    That's true. Point taken. PSU, however, lost to their pesky nemesis, Iowa. We beat Iowa.

    I know, I know, PSU was Away and we were Home. But...if A=B an B=C, then A=C.

    Who knows? We'll find out Saturday. I'm cautiously optimistic.

    (To the author: great story, by the way.)

    Posted by msulhs777 on 11/20/08 at 8:37PM

    This New Years day UofM might want to practice their vision for next season.... You know, being on the out side looking in. MSU has done it for years. It's about time the tides turn. GO STATE!

    Posted by msulhs777 on 11/20/08 at 8:37PM

    This New Years day UofM might want to practice their vision for next season.... You know, being on the out side looking in. MSU has done it for years. It's about time the tides turn. GO STATE!

    Posted by taterrific2 on 11/21/08 at 12:33AM

    msulhs777 on 11/20/08 at 8:37PM:
    "This New Years day UofM might want to practice their vision for next season.... You know, being on the out side looking in. MSU has done it for years. It's about time the tides turn. GO STATE!"

    MSU is having a very good and potentially great year and deserves to be congratulated. However, many Spartan fans are thinking like what Grinczel wrote to start this article:

    "They just didn't think it would take 15 years to see the season finale between Michigan State and Penn State achieve the perennial importance of Michigan-Ohio State."

    One very good and potentially great year does not constitute "perennial" anything. When the Spartans string together five or ten very good years, with one or two great ones thrown in, then they can start talking about the "perennial importance" of MSU/PSU or UM being "on the outside looking in."

    Until they actually do it, like your basketball team has, it's just talk.

    As for UM's chances of beating OSU, they are one in a hundred at best. But they still have to play the game. And in rivalry games, you just never know.

    Posted by rreaganrules on 11/21/08 at 2:39PM

    The 1956 Chevy Corvette didn't have fins you idiot. Take a look at a 1959 Cadillac if you want to see fins.

    Posted by dmac4330 on 11/21/08 at 5:43PM

    tater...Your first comment, was very funny.

    Posted by dmac4330 on 11/21/08 at 5:48PM

    But I think the depiction should be made if OSU loses, not if U of M wins.





    LATEST MSU SPARTANS NEWS
  • Raymar Morgan named Big Ten Player of the Week
  • Raymar Morgan leads Spartans over Northwestern
  • Former Spartan, NFL player, Mark Ingram captured in Michigan after month on lam
  • Spartans' Goran Suton nearly back to full strength
  • Spartans' future bright after nine-win season
  • ESSENTIALS
    Basketball
  • Schedule
  • Roster
  • Team Statistics
  • Standings
  • Top 25 Scores
  • Latest Polls
  • Latest Recruits
  • Football
  • Schedule
  • Roster
  • Team Statistics
  • Standings
  • Top 25 Scores
  • Latest Polls
  • Latest Recruits
  • MSU FORUMS
    Fans gather here to discuss the latest Spartans news.
    Football

    Maybe UM by spartwest2 01/05/2009 11:05 p.m. ET

    Except when he kicked... by WMMSUfan 01/05/2009 11:12 p.m. ET

    Basketball

    MoPete's #42 by VegasVic 01/05/2009 10:46 p.m. ET

    This is a stretch by spartwest2 01/05/2009 11:01 p.m. ET

    Other Sports

    Perspective... by farmer5 01/01/2009 2:09 p.m. ET

    MSU women by farmer5 01/01/2009 3:02 p.m. ET

    NEWSFLASH
    Big Ten News



    Home | News | Sports | Forums | Blogs | Entertainment | Jobs | Autos | Real Estate | Classifieds | Shopping
    Complete Forecast | RSS Feeds | RSS Terms and Conditions | Site Index | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Help/Feedback
    Ann Arbor News | Bay City Times | Flint Journal | Grand Rapids Press
    Jackson Citizen Patriot | Kalamazoo Gazette | Muskegon Chronicle | Saginaw News
    © 2008 Michigan Live LLC. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Advertising Agreement,
    User Agreement and Privacy Policy.