It dominated college football headlines for weeks. Many read about it, some wrote about it, and Ashton Kutcher's doppelganger even video-blogged about it.

Wednesday night, the moment came: The Big Ten division alignments were announced.

And here's a bevy of reactions to the big news.

AnnArbor.com

• Pete Bigelow feels that amid the Big Ten changes, a lot stays the same for the Michigan football team
• Mike Rothstein says Big Ten officials got the divisional realignment right because they listened to fans, and breaks down the winners and losers from the alignment
  
• Kyle Feldscher checks in with local football fans, who mostly support the new divisions

• Michigan-Ohio State game stays in place, but all is not well, writes Michael Rosenberg
• If anyone still doubted Big Ten's primary brand, wonder no more, says Mark Snyder
  

• Fox 2 News Sports Director Dan Miller dislikes new Big Ten alignment

• Matt Hayes says Bo and Woody would upchuck over separation of Michigan, Ohio State

• Big Ten gets division alignment almost perfect, writes Tom Dienhart
  

• Iowa AD excited about playing Nebraska every year, disappointed about not playing Wisconsin

• Wisconsin fans probably feeling empty and angry, assumes Jeff Potrykus

• New divisions worked out about as well as possible for Indiana, feels Terry Hutchens

• Illinois-Northwestern rivalry protected and will continue

• Penn State fares well in revamped Big Ten

• Minnesota-Wisconsin rivalry was at the top of Minnesota AD's wish list

• Nebraska AD feels rivalries with other Big Ten teams will occur naturally

• Big Ten booted it, says Dennis Dodd

• Big Ten blogger Adam Rittenberg gives his take on the Big Ten divisions, schedules