Posted: Sep 30, 2009 at 12:37 AM [Sep 30, 2009]
Welcome to "Scouting Ahead," a scouting report on Michigan's next opponent (when there is TV footage available).
For Michigan State, I watched the Spartans' game against a common opponent, Notre Dame. The Irish held on for a dramatic 33-30 win over Michigan State a week after Michigan beat the Irish, 38-34.
OFFENSIVE PLAY-BY-PLAY:
FIRST SERIES:
-The Spartans’ offensive line was able to pick up Notre Dame’s blitz well in the first quarter, especially when the Irish passed.
-Michigan State likes to use tight ends a lot. Uses three of them in different formations.
-Loved the WR pass to Blair White in the second quarter. It caught Notre Dame completely off guard.
-Can see why Keith Nichol plays. He’s much more mobile than Cousins, which offers a nice change-of-pace option for Michigan State. But he isn’t fast enough that it should be the only reason to use him if Cousins and State is playing well.
-That said, Kirk Cousins should be the starter based off of this game. For most of the game, he played extremely well. The last drive made him the goat with the interception, but it overshadowed an otherwise impressive day. His second-to-last drive, under pressure, was shaky, though. The last drive, save for the last two plays, he looked good. He marched Michigan State right down the field and could have scored. He was 7-of-10 on the final drive, but when MSU got close, he folded while trying to make a play.
-The way Michigan State’s offense moved on Notre Dame the week after Michigan did the same, especially in the second half, makes you wonder how good the Irish defense is, or if both teams’ offenses are really that good and balanced.
-Michigan State showed a lot of balance, a lot more than last season when Javon Ringer had to do everything for the Spartans.
-Considering Michigan’s porous run defense and questionable secondary play at corner opposite Donovan Warren, wouldn’t be surprised if MSU mixes things up a lot with a heavy does of out routes early to the side opposite Warren. From this tape, they seem able to do that extremely well with Cousins in the game.
-Michigan State’s offensive line blocked really well. Tough to tell on pass blocking because Notre Dame’s front seven has been pretty unimpressive this season, but the running game was able to gash well. Again, tough to say how good they are or how much that is Notre Dame’s ineptness. There was the same question after the Michigan-Notre Dame game about the Wolverines’ offensive line.
-Michigan State’s wide receivers are a little bit underrated. Blair White might be the second-best receiver in the Big Ten behind Arrelious Benn of Illinois (and just ahead of Eric Decker of Minnesota). Cunningham is a great leaper and has good hands, as is Dell. They could be a big, big problem for Michigan.
DEFENSIVE THOUGHTS:
-Michigan State opened in nickel because Notre Dame ran three wide receivers. They’d shift into a base 4-3.
-The Spartans had pressure on the first series, but no one bothered to pick up Clausen, who found a wide open Kyle Rudolph. No one was guarding him. Big defensive miscue there. Early on, Michigan State seemed unable to pick up tight ends.
-Early on, Michigan State’s defense couldn’t stop Notre Dame on the first drive. The
Irish made the Spartans look pretty horrific. Not much by way of run defense. On Armando Allen’s touchdown run, he was barely touched up the middle.
-Michigan State in pass rush got good pressure off Notre Dame’s tackles, but it opened up the middle a lot for Jimmy Clausen, who isn’t a mobile quarterback like Tate Forcier, to run through.
-Michigan State’s secondary completely lost Michael Floyd on the Irish’s second touchdown. For some reason, WILL linebacker Eric Gordon was on Floyd. Gordon was beat easily. FS Trenton Robinson was trying to get over in support, but he was too late. Really bad decision making and reaction by the Spartans’ defense.
-Michigan State really struggled picking up the swing pass and screen pass. Often, the receiver got 5 or so yards before anyone came in close to make contact.
-Michigan State sacked Jimmy Clausen in the second quarter, sending six guys, including two linebackers right up the middle. First group to get to Clausen at that point on the year and actually injured Clausen on the play. Eric Gordon had a clean shot. Michigan State dominated the Notre Dame offensive line there.
-It took an injury to Clausen and a bunch of penalties for Michigan State to stop Notre Dame for the first time in the second quarter.
-Michigan State really seemed to struggle tackling against the run. Armando Allen was able to run pretty cleanly, breaking tackles along the way. The Spartans looked like they wanted to arm tackle a lot instead of using the body.
-Michigan State got lucky on the play Floyd got injured. He had feet inbounds when he came down with the ball before he landed out of bounds with his body. The coverage by Michigan State field corner Jeremy Ware was pretty good on the play, but Floyd outjumped him. The play was not ruled a touchdown, although it looked like it was. The series ended up in a Notre Dame field goal as MSU did a good job after the play holding the Irish to a field goal.
-Michigan State’s secondary did a pretty decent job on Notre Dame. Certainly, a better job than Michigan, but the Spartans were aided by the lack of Floyd for more than a half and a semi-hobbled Jimmy Clausen. That said, the combination of Ware and Kendell Davis-Clark along with Chris L. Rucker played well enough that it wasn’t a complete throw-and-catch fest like the Michigan game.
-On the first drive of the second half, Michigan State had a total meltdown on defense. State couldn’t get much pressure at all. And then State lost Tate as he crossed in the middle of the field before wandering into the area of Trenton Robinson while making the catch. Considering Floyd was out of the game, it was an interesting strategy not to throw a ton of attention at Tate, especially on the first series. Not the best halftime adjustment.
-Tackling, though, was much better early in the second half.
-Michigan State sold out on the run in the Wildcat near the goal-line on the first drive after half, completely bit which allowed an easy pass from Armando Allen to Robby Parris for a touchdown. The Spartans didn’t seem very good at having to adjust from their assignments if they see a play different than anticipated.
-Michigan State couldn’t really handle Golden Tate, which makes me wonder at least how they’ll deal with the speed of Michigan’s halfbacks and a guy like Darryl Stonum in space. Could see some big plays for Stonum based off of this tape. Tate burnt Michigan State time and again, including once midway through the third quarter which would have been a touchdown, except Tate dropped it.
-Chris L. Rucker had a great defensive coverage on Golden Tate early in the fourth quarter, knocking down a deep touchdown pass. Rucker had a pretty good day overall, didn’t get picked on by Clausen and the Notre Dame offense.
-Rucker, though, had a sure interception fall through his hands on a missed route/overthrown ball by Clausen. He was the only one within 20 yards of the ball. The drive ended in Notre Dame’s game-winning touchdown.
-On the game-winning touchdown play, safety Marcus Hyde was beaten by Tate. Tate had a step and there wasn’t much he could do with the ball that was thrown, no way he could have gotten to that. Tate, of course, ended up diving into the Michigan State band.
-Michigan State’s defense, under pressure to make a stop in the last defensive series of the game, played well, although it was helped by penalties, miscommunications and drops by Notre Dame. Still, they gave the offense a chance.
GOLDEN TATE JUMPING INTO THE MICHIGAN STATE BAND, SET TO BONNIE TYLER's 'TOTAL ECLIPSE OF THE HEART:'
SPECIAL TEAMS:
-Glenn Winston doesn’t seem to have a ton of speed on kick returns, but has patience for his blocks to open up. Don’t know how much of an issue that will be for Michigan, which has played well on kick coverage so far this year. Michigan State appears to have good blocking on kick returns, allowing Winston to find holes. Winston shouldn’t break for any touchdowns, but he likely could end up with decent returns most times out.
-Aaron Bates had a decent first punt.
-Brett Swenson is one of the best kickers in the country. Made a 42-yarder look easy in the first quarter. Missed from 52 yards hitting the upright, but had a good five yards of distance to go.
-Swenson, though, had an extra point blocked in the second half.
-Kick coverage on the first kickoff was pretty bad. Theo Riddick from Notre Dame made two people miss. Plus, another Michigan State defender just fell. The Spartans looked better, specifically on the last kick coverage of the first half.
-Punt miscommunication on the first attempt at a Keshawn Martin return. A blocker ran into him, not allowing Martin to catch the ball.
-Nice special teams call in the second quarter trying to catch Notre Dame sleeping with an onside kick. It was almost a perfect kick by Swenson. It went exactly 10 yardds, rolled back and was recovered by Michigan State.
Michael Rothstein covers University of Michigan sports for Annarbor.com. He can be reached at (734) 623-2558, by e-mail at michaelrothstein@annarbor.com or follow on Twitter @mikerothstein.
tater
Posted Sep 30 2009
Notre Dame gets "up" for two rivalry games a year: UM and USC. MSU is always a trap game for them, and they often lose to MSU after expending all of their energy, both emotional and physical, against UM the week before.
MSU took Claussen out of much of the game with a dirty hit, played the second half against a Floyd-less ND, was playing a team that was listless compared to its performance against UM the week before, and still managed to lose.
Here is what we really need to know about MSU: they lost to Central, lost this game to an ND team that was half the team they were against UM, and were blown out by Wisky before making the score look respectable against a "prevent defense." As most fans know, the only thing a "prevent defense" accomplishes is to prevent the defense from performing to its potential, so the Wisky game should really be viewed as a blowout, despite the final score.
If this wasn't a rivalry game, UM would be a twenty point favorite. It is only sheer bile and hatred that will allow MSU to keep their margin of loss to ten points.
BoulderLion
Posted Sep 30 2009
What a detailed breakdown of a game...I'd love to have a job like yours.