You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Tue, Dec 20, 2011 : 5:58 a.m.

With Michigan basketball likely off to its second straight 10-2 start, here's a look inside the numbers

By Nick Baumgardner

What a difference a year makes. Or does it?

Through its first 12 non-conference games a season ago, the Michigan basketball team sat at 10-2 with a double-digit average margin of victory.

And, if all goes as expected Thursday during their final pre-Big Ten tuneup against Bradley (6:30 p.m., BTN), the Wolverines will be 10-2 with a double-digit average margin of victory.

After moving to 10-2 last season, Michigan got off to a 1-7 start in Big Ten play before rebounding down the stretch. The Wolverines open their conference slate at home against Penn State on Dec. 29.

Will history repeat itself? Time will tell.

For now, here's a look inside the numbers from where Michigan was, to where it is now:


TREY-BURKE.JPG

Freshman point guard Trey Burke isn't distributing assists at the same rate as Darius Morris did a year ago, but his teammates have picked up the slack.

Angela J. Cesere | AnnArbor.com

What's the same

Assists

The "how does Michigan replace Darius Morris" question has truly been answered.

At least for now.

Through its first 11 games a year ago, a Morris-ran Michigan offense had 157 total assists. Through the first 11 this year, a Trey Burke-ran Michigan offense has notched 156 assists.

With 52 assists, Burke is currently 26 behind the pace Morris was on during his record-setting effort a year ago. However, Burke's teammates have more than pulled their weight to make up for the loss of 235 assists Morris racked up a season ago.

Tim Hardaway Jr. already has 30 assists, just 29 less than he did all of last year. Zack Novak's numbers are also up in this area with 28 assists, 12 more than he had last year at this point.

Senior guard Stu Douglass and sophomore forward Evan Smotrycz have also added to Michigan's ball-sharing category, collecting 21 and 13 assists, respectively.

How has Michigan replaced Darius Morris?

Burke's done an awful lot of shot distributing, but the team hasn't been too shabby, either.


UMBB_UVA_Morgan_Feat.jpg

Sophomore forward Jordan Morgan is averaging three less points and two less rebounds this season than he did in his redshirt freshman season for Michigan.

What's different

Jordan Morgan's production

Last season at this time, Jordan Morgan was well on his way to becoming one of the more notable surprises in the Big Ten.

After sitting out his entire freshman campaign, Morgan was averaging 10.1 points and 6.9 rebounds through Michigan's first 11 games.

This time around, the 6-foot-8, 250-pound redshirt sophomore forward has seen a dip in points per game (7.1) and rebounds per game (4.6). His assists (1) are also down and his turnovers (20) are up.

Morgan's numbers suffered a dip in Big Ten play, but even with that, his 9.2 points and 5.4 rebounds last season are still more than he's putting up in both categories right now.

What's the issue?

It's not health. Michigan coach John Beilein recently brushed off a question about whether Morgan was dealing with any type of injury.

A quick glance might lend one to believe foul trouble isn't an issue either. Morgan has committed nine fewer fouls through the first 11 games this season.

A deeper look tells a different story, though, as Morgan has picked up two fouls before halftime on five occasions -- virtually taking him out of the action in each instance.

So, Morgan is again struggling to stay on the floor, and when he is on the court, he's not producing with the same consistency from a year ago.

Smotrycz's improvement as an interior player has helped Michigan overcome Morgan's dip to this point, but one has to wonder how long the Wolverines can survive in the Big Ten without a true threat at the center position.


Smotrycz_Oakland.JPG

Sophomore Evan Smotrycz has been a big contributor to Michigan's improved shooting percentage over last season.

Angela J. Cesere | AnnArbor.com

What's encouraging

Shooting numbers

Michigan had its good days and bad days from both inside and outside the 3-point arc a year ago, finishing toward the middle of the Big Ten in field goal percentage and 3-point shooting.

Through 11 games last season, Michigan was at 43.7 percent overall and 31 percent from 3-point range. This season, the Wolverines are up in both categories -- shooting 49.4 percent from the floor, 38 percent from deep.

Why?

Two reasons: Michigan's been better around the basket so far this season, making 58.3 percent of its two-point field goals. And, the addition of Burke as a legitimate deep shooting threat seems to have bolstered the team's already dangerous 3-point prowess.

Morris was a 29-percent outside shooter at this point last season. As of today, Burke is hitting at 39 percent from deep.

Smotrycz is shooting a scorching 54.8 percent (17-for-31) from long range, while Novak is hitting 43.2 percent (16-for-37) of his 3-pointers. Hardaway Jr. has knocked down 20 triples (34.5 percent) and, after a sluggish start, both Douglass and Matt Vogrich have shown an improvement from the outside of late.

With both Burke and Hardaway being legitimate threats to score from the outside or off the dribble, more open looks have been created for the rest of Michigan's shooters -- resulting in a higher percentage overall.


What's troubling

Turnovers

The assists are fine. The turnovers are not.

Michigan's turnover number is up 21 from a year ago at this point, and more concerning, the Wolverines' penchant for coughing the ball up seems to be a momentum-gaining problem.

Over the past three games against Oakland, Arkansas-Pine Bluff and Alabama A&M, Michigan has averaged 17 turnovers.

No offense to the Golden Grizzlies, Golden Lions or Bulldogs, but Michigan will likely be working against much more capable defensive units from here on out.

The three main culprits have been Smotrycz, Morgan and Hardaway.

Smotrycz and Hardaway have combined to turn the ball over 19 times over the past three games, while Morgan currently has 19 more turnovers than he does assists on the year.

The general sloppiness with the basketball has allowed the likes of Towson, Iowa State and Arkansas-Pine Bluff to spoil potential blowouts this season.

So far, the turnovers haven't hurt Michigan where it hurts most.

However, if the issue continues into Big Ten play, the Wolverines won't be counting the number of times it settled for a less-impressive blowout.

Instead, they'll be counting losses.

***

A year ago, Michigan opened the season 10-2 before having to fight for its life down the stretch to advance to the NCAA Tournament.

This season, the Wolverines will likely once again enter Big Ten play with a 10-2 mark, and a national ranking to boot.

Will they continue to trend upward, or will the start be smoke and mirrors?

Conference play starts in 10 days. The answer to those questions will soon follow.

Nick Baumgardner covers Michigan basketball for AnnArbor.com. He can be reached at 734-623-2514, by email at nickbaumgardner@annarbor.com and followed on Twitter @nickbaumgardner.

Want to stay connected to Wolverine basketball in your Facebook newsfeed? “Like” AnnArbor.com's Michigan Basketball News & Views.

Comments

Mick

Wed, Dec 21, 2011 : 8:35 p.m.

Hey Nick, thanks for the great job you do for us, I enjoy your thorough writing and coverage in general. However: "Through its first 11 games a year ago, a Morris-ran Michigan offense had 157 total assists. Through the first 11 this year, a Trey Burke-ran Michigan offense has notched 156 assists. With 52 assists, Burke is currently 26 behind the pace Morris was on during his record-setting effort a year ago. However, Burke's teammates have more than pulled their weight to make up for the loss of 235 assists Morris racked up a season ago". These numbers don't seem like they add up here or the sentence doesn't make sense either, or am I just being the dummy here? Anyway, I really, really like this team and it's potential. I was calling for Beilein's job after the 1st half of the B1G season last year because I wasn't seeing a winner of a program being built in the middle of his 4th season. However, they kept improving got it done, he's recruiting like we should now and the team plays a fun, smart and dangerous game to play for opponents. The future looks bright and this team is gonna win at least 22 to 25 games this year, the only way we don't is because the B1G is so tough this year. I predicted 10-2 before this season for the Football Team and many people laughed. The Football and B-Ball Teams are finally becoming great again together like it used to be for 30-40 years it seemed like. The 1st decade of the 21st Century had it's ups and downs, the 2nd seems like things are getting back to where they should be for both programs. Go Blue!!!

1959Viking

Wed, Dec 21, 2011 : 1:33 p.m.

Tough article, but true and fair. However, this year they do return all but one of their rotation players; and experience and having upperclassmen makes a difference. This also give them more options to turn to to when the challenges come in Big Ten play. Somebody different will step up every week. I like their chances even better this year.