The Purple Rose Theatre's "Boeing Boeing" struggles to get airborne

(background) Michelle Mountain; (middle) Matthew David and Jeff Thomakos; (foreground) Charlyn Swarthout, Stacie Hadgikosti and Rhiannon Ragland
photo by Danna Segrest, courtesy of the Purple Rose Theatre Co.
We’ve all experienced flight delays due to weather conditions. So perhaps it’s only fitting that when I arrived at Chelsea's Purple Rose Theatre to see Marc Camoletti’s “air hostess”-packed farce “Boeing Boeing” on Sunday afternoon, I was immediately ushered down to the building’s basement to ride out a tornado warning with my fellow passengers - er, patrons.
And once we were finally seated in the theater, a young woman assuming the persona of a flight attendant performed the pre-show, "turn off your cell phones" speech. Cute, but not laugh-out-loud funny - a thought I had often while watching “Boeing Boeing.”
Set in 1965 Paris, “Boeing” tells the story of Bernard (Jeff Thomakos), an American man who’s living in Paris while juggling three fiancées, all of whom work as air hostesses: an American named Gloria (Stacie Hadgikosti); an Italian named Gabriella (Rhiannon Raglund); and a German named Gretchen (Charlyn Swarthout).
When Bernard’s old friend from Wisconsin, Robert (Matthew David), unexpectedly arrives in town, Bernard explains how he meticulously arranges his daily life around the women’s flight schedules - thereby driving his grumbling maid Berthe (Michelle Mountain) up the wall. But Bernard’s fragile system threatens to come tumbling down when all three women arrive at the apartment on the same day.
Despite “Boeing”’s recent, much-celebrated resurrection - Matthew Warchus’ Broadway revival won two 2008 Tony Awards (out of six nominations) and heaps of critical praise - its script, adapted by Beverley Cross, rang stale to me. The woman-juggling storyline may not have been “played out” when the play premiered in the 60s, but some will likely find it to be so now. (The fact that I only found myself laughing once or twice during a farce seemed a red flag.)
And while first-time director Nate Mitchell stages the physical action with a sure hand - the production’s prize moment, hands down, comes when David makes a flying, desperate leap across the stage with a bean bag chair - the comic dialogue never goes much beyond being merely, well, cute (see paragraph two).
Part of the issue is that none of the play’s characters are particularly likable. Bernard is predictably arrogant and duplicitous; Robert falls for intense, brusque Gretchen after a mistaken-identity kiss, though I never could fathom exactly why; and Robert, who would appear to be the audience’s intended point of connection to this romantically chaotic world, isn’t a wholly sympathetic nice guy, either.
Perhaps it’s telling that when I initially researched the play and learned that David and Thomakos would be playing the male leads, I envisioned them in the opposite roles - David, so memorable as Stanley in the Rose’s production of “A Streetcar Named Desire,” as “Boeing”’s too-self-assured lothario, and Thomakos as the flustered American fish out of water. But even so, both actors commit wholeheartedly to bringing the screwball world of “Boeing” to life.
And although “Boeing”’s women don’t get too many sustained opportunities to shine - they’re too busy being pushed into and out of rooms - Hadgikosti managed to provide some appealing energy and spark each time she appeared on stage.
Bartley H. Bauer designed “Boeing”’s large, muted-palette, Paris apartment set, complete with several doors for slamming (and partial views of a kitchen and one bedroom). The split level-set serves the action well, and two elements in particular - a lounge chair that does double duty as a bar (where can I order one of these?), and a couch that has a highly unusual and fabulous feature - are visual knockouts.
Christianne Myers, meanwhile, does a fine job creating bright, curve-hugging-yet-institutional uniforms for the air hostesses - as well as character-specific lingerie, of course - and wisely opts for the turtleneck-with-jacket brand of cool for Bernard.
So there are several talented people involved in “Boeing” - but for me, the show never quite got off the ground.
Jenn McKee is the entertainment digital journalist for AnnArbor.com. Reach her at jennmckee@annarbor.com or 734-623-2546, and follow her on Twitter @jennmckee.
Comments
andrea anderson
Sun, Aug 1, 2010 : 1:01 a.m.
We thank you for a more honest review, all too often The Purple Rose are given undeserved great reviews. We saw this play on Broadway and at other theatres and this was by far the worse production we saw. It was totally miscast and we found nothing appealing about the characters and they took the funny right out of the play.
A2lover
Mon, Jul 5, 2010 : 1:39 p.m.
In my opinion Purple Rose has mangled many a classic play + Blithe Spirit, Born Yesterday and even Our Town (lots of cross, unintelligible dialogue). And just because the Free Press gave the misguided Streetcar a Best Play Award doesn't make it so. William Hurt? Who cares what he thinks. He's not an arbiter of good quality theatre. Ronnie Wood was at Wimbledon, Mick Jagger at the World Cup, doesn't put them up there with John Mcenroe or Pele. The Rose approach to classics seems to be, we'll do them our misconceived way, who cares, the audience around here doesn't know the difference, and not do we for that matter.
Master7
Thu, Jul 1, 2010 : 8:44 p.m.
"Purple Rose has trouble with classics??? Are you kidding me? Bus Stop? Detroit Free Press Award Best Play, Streetcar? Glass Menagery? Blithe Spirit. The most heartfelt gut wrenching Our Town I've ever seen. William Hurt saw Glass Menagery twice yeah that William Hurt and said it was the "BEST most tender Tennessee Williams he had ever witnessed". A2 lover?? You obviously have no idea what you're seeing. That's ok. You're not alone. Keep going to the theatre, any theatre.
A2lover
Mon, Jun 28, 2010 : 8:16 a.m.
The play was a bit old fashioned (although others seem to have pulled it off) but for me it was miscast, pretty much across the board. And, with a young director, obviously not to well acquainted with farce, the show did not have the speed or spark much needed with that style of theatre. The set was great and the costumes ok. PRT frequently has trouble with classics, they seem much better suited to new works that are able to be presented without comparison.