You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Sun, Jun 23, 2013 : 5:48 a.m.

Increased Ann Arbor police funding a goal worth pursuing

By AnnArbor.com Staff

Ann Arbor's a pretty safe place. Although it sometimes might not seem like it, crime in the city for the most part remains near historic lows, with yet another drop in violent crimes recorded last year.

That's at least partly due to the job done by the Ann Arbor Police Department, which has remained effective despite budget cutbacks in recent years. However, Police Chief John Seto has publicly said the department could do better—take a more proactive approach—with more staff.

Thumbnail image for party_patrol.jpg

Police patrol South University Ave within the Ann Arbor DDA Zone.

It's a good point, and it's encouraging to see city officials take it seriously.

Seto spoke out on the issue last month, saying that the department does a good job of reacting to crime. But, he argued, proactive efforts like increased downtown foot patrols and more community outreach could help make a strong community even stronger. He also mentioned the concept of a cross-jurisdiction "crime strategy unit," which shows intriguing potential. Overall, his points made a lot of sense.

The difficulty, of course, is that they would require more staff to implement. And the city's budget has been tight in recent years.

During last month's budget deliberations, the council considered—and ultimately rejected, 6-5—a push to add three full-time employees to the police department. The problem was that the change would have been funded by cutting the 15th District Court budget, likely leading to the loss of half of the court's six probation officers.

That would have been a pretty extreme trade-off, but the fact that it found five votes in favor shows how seriously council members are taking this. At that meeting, Mayor John Hieftje suggested the Downtown Development Authority might be able to fund three police officers dedicated to the city's core. And earlier this month the council made that a formal request, asking the DDA board to pay for three beat cops.

Of course, it's always a good idea to have a bit of built-in skepticism when any government agency makes a plea for more staffing. In this case, however, the benefits are clear—more police downtown would likely improve the department's ability to be proactive and the public's perception of downtown safety.

In approaching the DDA, the council found a good way to start addressing an an important concern. Here's hoping that the DDA agrees, and that the council continues to work on ways to strengthen public safety.

Comments

mady

Tue, Jun 25, 2013 : 2:12 p.m.

yes, yes, yes, yes and YES!!!!!

Elijah Shalis

Mon, Jun 24, 2013 : 12:56 a.m.

We do not need anymore police officers. America is already become a near police state with the NSA and PRISM.

Befuddled

Sun, Jun 23, 2013 : 10:37 p.m.

Couldn't Ann Arbor look into employing Part-time officers to enhance the Full-time Staff? This is common practice in other surrounding communities. You could possibly have 6 more officers instead of just 3.

Fordie

Mon, Jun 24, 2013 : 3:26 p.m.

You still have to train part-time officers though and that is just as expensive for them as it is for full-time.

Dirty Mouth

Sun, Jun 23, 2013 : 8:26 p.m.

Beat cops are an important community resource!

DJBudSonic

Sun, Jun 23, 2013 : 8:12 p.m.

The DDA should be paying for the extra officers, for if that money was not "skimmed" by the DDA in the first place, the city general fund would be able to pay for them. Reducing the court budget, esp. if it meant a 50% reduction in probation officers, is not the way to go. Those existing probation officers do a good job, and they are busy. We need them as much as beat police. I hope the DDA comes to its senses about the reasonable requests the city is making to guide DDA spending; the DDA board would do well to remember not to bite the hand that feeds them.

Brad

Sun, Jun 23, 2013 : 11:10 p.m.

Yep, those dollars would be going into a fund controlled by our *elected* representatives to use as they see fit to benefit the ENTIRE city. Not just the "tourist corridor".

anti-thug

Sun, Jun 23, 2013 : 4:45 p.m.

yes we need officers on foot so ticket you for J walking across a red light.

amlive

Mon, Jun 24, 2013 : 2:40 a.m.

Actually AT, crossing against traffic lights or outside of crosswalks is not a crime in Ann Arbor. As I recall, the law here pretty much says you can cross anywhere anytime, so long as you are not impeding traffic (which is indeed a common problem that I wouldn't mind seeing a bit more enforcement of).

An Arborigine

Sun, Jun 23, 2013 : 8:29 p.m.

And to ticket bikers for not obeying traffic signals

Steve

Sun, Jun 23, 2013 : 11:39 a.m.

Getting police out of their cars and onto the streets is important. Just their presence alone on the street makes people feel safer and would deter "would be" criminals.... I also have read that Police enjoy walking around and interacting with the public.. a lot more than sitting/riding around in their car.....

T Wall

Sun, Jun 23, 2013 : 11:36 a.m.

If our Police Chief John Seto has publicly said the department could do better—take a more proactive approach—with more staff. If this is ever going to happen we first need to make sure that everyone in Ward 4 vote for Jack Eaton in the up coming August primary.

Brad

Sun, Jun 23, 2013 : 5:11 p.m.

Along with that those of you in Ward 3 need to return Steve Kunselman to council. Knowledge and experience versus ?