Plastic bags are a bane, but an Ann Arbor-only ban isn't the answer
8 Comments. Comment Now
Paper or plastic? The best answer is neither, which is one reason we don’t support a ban on plastic grocery bags in the city of Ann Arbor, well-intentioned though that proposal may be.
Last month, the Ann Arbor City Council tabled a resolution that would prohibit large retailers in the city from giving plastic carry-out bags to their customers. Council member Stephen Rapundalo, D-2nd Ward, asked for more time to review the idea, which will be brought back by the end of the year.
Efforts to ban plastic bags are gaining momentum not just across the United States, but globally. Countries such as China and Ireland have banned or taxed their use, as have cities like San Francisco and Washington, D.C.
Still, the case against plastic grocery bags isn’t as compelling as the global movement would suggest. There’s evidence that using paper bags is as harmful to natural resources, if not more so. And even though billions of plastic bags are dispensed each year, they account for but a fraction of the waste in landfills or litter on the streets.
Not that we’re a fan of plastic bags. Be they an ecological nightmare or a lesser scourge, they are environmentally damaging. We welcome efforts to greatly reduce their use and greatly increase the recycling of them, even though we wouldn’t advocate an outright ban of them that applied to the city only.
Many environmentalists would agree that the best solution is not to encourage the use of paper bags over plastic bags, but rather for shoppers to eschew both and choose reusable bags instead. A reusable bag, used four or more times before it’s disposed of, is better for the environment.
To ban plastic bags in the city of Ann Arbor would have symbolic value, and would cause some people to switch to reusable bags - though others would just use paper bags, or would do their shopping at nearby stores outside the city.
But reducing the use of plastic bags is something that most people could do fairly easily, if they chose to. We see this more as a matter of personal responsibility, rather than something to be addressed on an isolated basis in Ann Arbor through public policy that puts the burden on retailers - many of whom already are addressing the issue voluntarily.
There are ample examples of grocery stores making it easier for customers to reduce the use of plastic bags locally. Meijer offers a plastic bag recycling program in its stores, and sells inexpensive reusable bags. Busch’s also sells reusable bags for 99 cents, and offers customers a 5-cent credit each time they re-use an Eco-Bag or bring a paper bag back to the store for re-use.
We understand reusable bags aren’t as practical for larger purchases of groceries. Other options would be for more communities to offer plastic bag recycling, or incentives for greater use of biodegradable or compostable plastic bags.
Sure, Ann Arbor could follow San Francisco’s lead and ban plastic bags. Then again, a study found that chewing gum resulted in more litter on the streets of San Francisco than plastic bags did. So what’s next - a ban on gum?
We as individuals should take it upon ourselves to reduce our use of plastic bags and free our elected officials to focus on the more pressing local concerns they have before them.
(This editorial was published in today's newspaper and reflects the opinion of the AnnArbor.com editorial board.)
Well written piece. Personal Responsibility for the win.
(Flag this Post)
Posted Oct 5
Agree with editorial and comment above.
(Flag this Post)
Posted Oct 5
Banning plastic bags is the answer? What was the question? I thought disposable diapers were the problem? Since building materials are the largest single item in landfills, why aren't we banning buildings? - or at least their materials (sometimes I wonder about material-less buildings - what would they look like?).
*
It's not about landfills, its about energy? OH? How much energy does it take to make a paper bag? How much coal, oil, NG is burned in the harvesting, pulping, mfg, and distribution of the heavier bags?
*
It is about "pollution"? I guess there is not any pollution in re-cycling paper (or in virgin stock). Aren't caustic chemicals required for the processing of paper, where do those go?
*
While I admit paper does make me feel better than plastic - it doesn't make the trees feel any better!
(Flag this Post)
Posted Oct 6
Nicely done, Mr. Dearing. I like the idea of incentives for bringing your own bags. I think this is a better approach than a ban.
(Flag this Post)
Posted Oct 6
Thank you for this. Please help us keep the city council focused on real problems, like taxes, layoffs, bringing business to the community, and disappearing state funding.
(Flag this Post)
Posted Oct 6
The A2 News drops a small newspapers stuffed into blue plastic bags. STOP THAT!
(Flag this Post)
Posted Oct 7
Well said. Why ban something that is recyclable...we all have better things we could do. If all of their effort was put toward educating people that they could recycle at Meijers then I am sure there would be no issue.
(Flag this Post)
Posted Oct 7
Julie, we deliver newspapers in plastic bags in order to protect against rain or snow, so the customer doesn't get a wet newspaper. The industry has been looking for a better solution and hasn't found one. The plastic bags we use can be recycled and in about four weeks, we will be switching to plastic bags that are made with recycled material.
AnnArbor.com Staff
(Flag this Post)
Posted Oct 8