You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Wed, Oct 3, 2012 : 5:58 a.m.

Shift to new model of serving Medicare patients comes as U-M Health System faces challenges

By Amy Biolchini

It may sound strange: A hospital that wants to keep patients out of its hospital.

For the University of Michigan Health System and hospitals across the country, it’s a strategy that is becoming the way of the future.

Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, health systems are encouraged to cut back on their costs by forming accountable care organizations to ensure the continuity of services for Medicare patients between primary care doctors and specialists — thereby reducing re-admissions to hospitals.

UMHS has been a pioneer with its participation in two accountable care organizations, said Dr. Ora Pescovitz, executive vice president for medical affairs at U-M and CEO of UMHS, at a Medicare symposium hosted by the Medicare News Group Tuesday in Ann Arbor.

U-M-hospitals.jpg

Part of the University of Michigan Health System campus.

University of Michigan Health System photo

“We believe in the idea of putting ourselves out of business because frankly, I don’t think we’ll ever be out of business,” she said.

Pescovitz acknowledged the future comes with risks — mostly related to changing funding sources. A potential “fiscal cliff” of a $100 to $200 million annual budget gap keeps Pescovitz up almost every night, she said.

The cliff is one Pescovitz said could be reached for several reasons.

“We are the sixth- to tenth-ranked medical school in the country, so we have a huge amount of (National Institutes of Health) funding. There’s likely to be an 8 to 9 percent decrease in NIH funding if Congress doesn’t do anything,” Pescovitz said Tuesday. “So we’re looking at a huge impact at our NIH budget, and about a 2 percent decrease in Medicare funding. And that’s assuming nothing happens.”

UMHS has an annual budget of about $3.1 billion. The Health System accounts for about half of the University of Michigan on several levels: Geographic footprint, number of employees and budget, Pescovitz said.

Administrators are unsure how things will financially shake out in the future.

“We are concerned about other things that may happen just in terms of general costs,” Pescovitz said, citing other changes due to health care reforms the hospital will have to deal with.

“When we look at the Medicaid expansion … that will have both positive and negative impacts on us and we’re not exactly sure how to balance all of that out. We currently take care of some uninsured patients, so some of those patients we will get paid for; on the other hand, we will see increasing numbers of Medicaid patients, and some of that will actually decrease our revenue as well.”

Currently, about 46 percent of the patients treated by UMHS are on government-funded insurance programs — 32 percent are Medicare patients and 14 percent are Medicaid patients.

Early predictions for the 2012 fiscal year indicate about one-third of UMHS’ patients are from Ann Arbor, one-third are from southeast Michigan and the rest are from Michigan and other states.

“We view ourselves as a resource for the state of Michigan — as a place for them to refer patients to,” said Dr. Steve Bernstein, assistant dean for clinical affairs at U-M’s Medical School. “If we don’t have relationships with those organizations, those referrals are going to dry up.”

UMHS recently announced it would be trading services and its brand name for a less than 10 percent stake in MidMichigan Health, a private, nonprofit health system that has four hospitals and covers 10 counties.

At the time of the announcement in August, Pescovitz said the agreement between the two health systems would cement the patient referrals from the middle of Michigan that currently exist.

The goal of accountable care organizations is to ensure a seamless stream of care for Medicare patients across doctor’s offices, hospitals and long-term care facilities by offering incentives.

Coordinating care outside of the hospital has the potential to reduce hospital admission and readmission rates for Medicare patients with chronic conditions.

Medicare patients with multiple chronic conditions — about one in four Americans, and two out of three Americans over the age of 65 — often receive care from multiple doctors, and account for about 93 percent of Medicare fees for service expenditures, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Under the Affordable Care Act, a shared savings program will reward accountable care organizations that lower health care costs but meet performance standards based on quality of care.

Amy Biolchini covers Washtenaw County, health and environmental issues for AnnArbor.com. Reach her at (734) 623-2552, amybiolchini@annarbor.com or on Twitter.

Comments

Jeremy Engdahl-Johnson

Thu, Oct 4, 2012 : 3:59 p.m.

Health and Human Services announced 89 new accountable care organizations, doubling the number of Medicare accountable care organizations (ACO). ACO research library: http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=5711

DennisP

Wed, Oct 3, 2012 : 6:41 p.m.

Lost in all this discussion of accountable care organizations, fiscal cliffs, and coordinated care is the fact that as of this week, the federal government will begin fining hospitals a substantial penalty when the hospital has too many readmissions of Medicare patients who were released from to go home. Do you think that may be a driving force for the UMHS going to an accountable care organization? I don't know that the motives are all as altruistic and caring as we are being led to believe here. There remains a financial reason as the underlying factor in this new program. For more on the penalty, see http://news.yahoo.com/medicare-fines-over-hospitals-readmitted-patients-084816882.html

BhavanaJagat

Wed, Oct 3, 2012 : 5:54 p.m.

How do you do? How is your health? This is a conventional expression used in greeting a person. The University has to define as to what this inquiry is about. There are impressive numbers about costs and I appreciate the concern about accountability. The best way to reduce costs would be that of helping people not to get transformed into patients, the commodity that hospitals and clinics use to maintain their account books.

YpsiVeteran

Wed, Oct 3, 2012 : 3:55 p.m.

God knows how many millions of dollars and, finally, an act of Congress is all it took for them to figure out doctors need to talk to each other about patients. It's depressing

YpsiVeteran

Wed, Oct 3, 2012 : 3:59 p.m.

Oh, and let's not forget the fancy name: "Accountable Care Organizations." Apparently, our health care organizations/bureaucracies felt no obligation to be "accountable" prior to this. Apparently, accountability is going to be a whole new paradigm for them. Isn't that special?

JRW

Wed, Oct 3, 2012 : 2:24 p.m.

UMHS is designed for high costs. For example, there are no free-standing, urgent care walk-in clinics associated with UMHS for the general public. Other states have built these facilities to accommodate the increase in primary care patients under the ACA. For example, in Massachusetts, there are many free-standing urgent care clinics all over the state that can handle the urgent issues for a far lower cost than an ER. All "urgent", non-emergency patients now have to go to a very expensive ER at UMHS, rather than a lower cost urgent care center. This forces UMHS patients into high cost ER facilities when that is not always necessary. UMHS gets more money, patients have much longer wait times for urgent vs emergency issues, and patients have higher out of pocket costs. Not a forward thinking model for today's needs to reduce costs in the health care system.

nekm1

Wed, Oct 3, 2012 : 1:30 p.m.

Medicare patients with multiple chronic conditions — about one in four Americans, and two out of three Americans over the age of 65 — often receive care from multiple doctors, and account for about 93 percent of Medicare fees for service expenditures Under the Affordable Care Act, a shared savings program will reward accountable care organizations that lower health care costs but meet performance standards based on quality of care. Welcome to the new world order. The question is Who, or what Panel of public bureaucrats will be making this decision on elderly care? YOUR elderly care...

Basic Bob

Wed, Oct 3, 2012 : 4:14 p.m.

This is not new, care providers have always made these choices and have been unaccountable to patients' families or the government. Some patients are wisely counseled to plan for the end.