You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Thu, May 17, 2012 : 5:57 a.m.

Officials: West Willow security cameras' value 'demonstrated in dramatic fashion' with sex assault arrest

By Tom Perkins

Nearly a year after Ypsilanti Township installed five public surveillance cameras in the West Willow neighborhood, one camera captured an image that directly led to the arrest of a man accused of sexually assaulting several girls last week.

It comes after some raised concerns that “Big Brother” was watching West Willow, but officials say the latest incident is proof the pilot camera program is an effective tool and re-asserted residents’ privacy is protected.

Mike Radzik, director of the township’s office of community standards, underscored that the cameras are only viewing public spaces, not residents' homes, and said he is pleased the camera system played a central role in apprehending a suspect wanted for a violent crime.

west_willow_assault.jpg

Police released this photo, taken by a West Willow security camera, of the sex assault suspect.

The suspect, Daniel Jackson, allegedly groped an 11-year-old girl and a 17-year-old girl in separate incidents on May 10. He faces 13 charges and has previously served 18 months for crimes related to sexual assaults.

Jackson was apprehended after Washtenaw County Sheriff's Office investigators circulated an image taken from security cameras posted in West Willow.

Radzik said officials are grateful law enforcement personnel identified a suspect before any additional assaults occurred.

“As details unravel, it appears the suspect is a violent repeat offender who likely would have continued until stopped. Clearly, the value of the township's camera system has been demonstrated in dramatic fashion,” Radzik said.

“The ability to quickly distribute a 'wanted poster' containing high-quality images of a suspect captured in close time and space proximity to the sexual assault and attempted abduction of a child is a powerful and effective tool. This is exactly what the township board envisioned when the pilot program was initiated."

In April 2011, the Ypsilanti Township Board of Trustees unanimously approved paying $30,000 for the program out of the township's police fund.

In response to privacy concerns, Radzik said the township board set “strict parameters” when developing the pilot program.

“We were very careful to place and aim the cameras only at public property and to restrict access only to law enforcement personnel, so use of the technology in this way is consistent with any expectation of privacy on public property,” Radzik said. “Captured images show what a witness would see if they were standing in the same place at the same time, and the technology preserves the images for instant distribution to law enforcement and the public to help solve crimes."

The cameras are fixed in place in five locations, cannot zoom, only record public places and do not face any homes. They are wireless, transmit images via cellular service and are attached to DTE Energy-owned utility poles.

Upon detecting motion in an area, the cameras start recording still images and transmit them back to a central computer. The images are selectively downloaded by the Sheriff's Department for investigative purposes. Images not downloaded are over-written by the device every four to five days, depending on the volume of activity, Radzik said.

The cameras don’t provide a live stream and no one regularly monitors the recordings. Instead, police could preview and download the images from a local computer at the police station as needed, Radzik said.

Officials previously said West Willow was selected for the pilot because of its high concentration of crime and because it is “defined and contained." The triangular-shaped neighborhood has five entrances and is bordered by Interstate 94 to the west and south; the I-94 service drive to north and west and Wiard Road to the east.

Sheriff’s Department Lt. Jim Anuszkiewicz said he wasn’t aware of any overwhelming concern about privacy issues.

“I believe the arrest of the suspect in this cases is a prime example of why the cameras were put in place,” he said. “Law enforcement continues to see alternative solutions to fighting crime through technology and this is one example of it.”

Anuszkiewicz said the cameras have been useful in general.

“We have utilized the cameras on and off since their installation,” he said. “They continue to be a useful tool to the Sheriff’s Office in a number of ways. Not only do they assist with solving crimes such as the sexual assault arrest but they are also useful in validating investigations.”

West_Willow.jpg

The West Willow neighborhood of Ypsilanti Township has been a pilot site for surveillance cameras.

Tom Perkins | For AnnArbor.com

Angela Barbash, who is involved with the New West Willow Neighborhood Association, said the cameras were welcomed as long as they didn’t interfere with privacy, were not moved and footage was maintained by elected officials.

But she said the group has asked township officials for “written policies and procedures that would ensure these protections, and reduce any misunderstanding about how and where the cameras would be used.”

“We have not yet received a written policy and are therefore keeping a close watch on their use as it unfolds,” Barbash said. “That being said, we heard from many residents who were very excited to see that they were helpful in this investigation. This certainly makes us hopeful that they will continue to be used in a manner that is most consistent with the concerns and well-being of our community.”

Radzik said official guidelines are in place for sheriff's office personnel when accessing the system, and a policy will be finalized if the pilot program is continued.

He said several other neighborhood groups have expressed interest in having cameras placed in their neighborhoods.

“The program's future will be deliberated as we approach the one year mark, and there appears to be widespread support to continue it,” he said. “We are developing a funding strategy so that it can be sustainable into the future.”

Comments

Cathy

Fri, May 18, 2012 : 12:26 a.m.

Don't worry, citizens, the government has promised not to misuse these surveillance devices. Now go about your business.

Billy Bob Schwartz

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 5:04 p.m.

I was just thinking about privacy, and considering facebook and other such sharing media, hidden public cameras, GPS tracers on phones and pretty much anything else, and other such treasures of 21st Century life, and I wonder if we really even know what privacy is anymore, or value it for much. I keep hearing this voice in my mind (figuratively speaking) saying, "What would Hitler do with this stuff"? It gives me the chills.

ArthGuinness

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 3:47 p.m.

As I said in another thread about this incident, every tool can be used or abused. For surveillance cameras, they could be abused by the police or security personnel (spying on political enemies, for example), or they could be hacked for other nefarious uses. An article just came out about how easy CCTV cameras can be hijacked: http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=12951 I'm just pointing this out, I'm not necessarily against cameras. What you do in public should generally be considered as such. On the other hand, people's expectation of privacy has significant legal merit. And I don't expect to be surveilled for no good reason. For example, if I walk into Bongz And Thongz, I think it's unreasonable for the police to report this to the press.

eyeonthenews

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 4:57 p.m.

Seriously, I don't think that would be an issue. But what if Bongz and Thongz already has surveillance cameras in their store? Kind of creepy but most stores do have cameras and that sounds like a place where you might show up on youtube not AnnArbor.com.

eyeonthenews

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 3:46 p.m.

I live in West Willow also and have approved of the cameras since first hearing they were being considered for this pilot program. I've actually heard some of my neighbors say they would like cameras on all the streets out here, not just the entrances, but that's not going to happen. Just glad we have the ones we have. They're obviously doing their job.

bunnyabbot

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 2:40 p.m.

" it appears the suspect is a violent repeat offender who likely would have continued until stopped. " well that is because sex offenders cannot be rehibilitated, they might go dormant in activities or fall of the radar but they cannot be trusted to be out in society. This guy is fairly young, he no doubt would have escalated his "need". Anyone of these girls could have easily been a kidnapping/murder victim. guys like these should be completely removed from society.

Jack

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 5:17 p.m.

He has escalated his "need" dozens on times. This man has a record a mile long. And each time he is once again put out on the street.

Sarah Rigg

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 2:13 p.m.

I live in West Willow and was vocal about not wanting the cameras in my neighborhood, just on general principal, but I'm glad they were a tool to help in this investigation. I'm also glad Angela is pushing for a written policy regarding how they are to be used. Also, regarding the "high concentration of crime" in West Willow. Check out this map and compare it to the map of Ann Arbor. The U-M campus has a comparable crime rate to West Willow (maybe a little higher if I'm reading the map correctly), but guess which area people are more afraid of? http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/mi/ann-arbor/crime/ http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/mi/ypsilanti/crime/

Sarah Rigg

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 5:49 p.m.

Even comparing *within* the boundaries of the city of Ypsilanti and Ypsilanti Township, West Willow does not have the highest crime concentration. It's not the safest of the areas marked, either, just somewhere in the middle.

Jack

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 5:38 p.m.

I'm really sorry, but I looked at the statistics in the sites you provided and the chances of becoming a victim of a crime in Ypsilanti was 1 in 86, in Ann Arbor 1 in 358. That's a huge difference.

ArthGuinness

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 3:49 p.m.

"I'm also glad Angela is pushing for a written policy regarding how they are to be used." I think this is a good point. Basically, it partially helps answer the question, "who will watch the watchmen?"

Plubius

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 12:54 p.m.

Using this logic, we should place cameras everywhere, including inside our homes, as they are certainly going to see something of interest eventually...

Chase Ingersoll

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 12:26 p.m.

The civil libertarian in me squirms. The father in me does not. Ultimately it should be the right of the local property owners, as to how best to secure their property and children. I think, this being Washtenaw County, someone should ask about the pixel definition, if the technology that is available with higher definition, video and sound is not readily available. Also - why is there not a site where any member of the public can log in and watch?

ArthGuinness

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 4 p.m.

Some good points here, especially about sound. It goes along with something similar I say lower down in this comment section about the expectation of privacy (which has significant legal precedence): most people would expect that a private conversation while walking down the sidewalk remains private if nobody appears to be nearby (and especially as cameras get smaller and smaller). If these cameras could pick up sound, I think that would certainly violate our privacy.

The Black Stallion3

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 12:18 p.m.

If the cameras don't work put a fence around it.

Silly Sally

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 12:12 p.m.

These cameras can also protect the innocent from false charges. Someone falsely accused an acquaintance of mine, and the police "investigation" was quickly dropped when a private security camera contradicted what they were claiming.

justcurious

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 11:52 a.m.

I'm glad the cameras were useful in identifying this man. Without them, he might be continuing to prey on women and girls. If you aren't doing anything wrong, you should not worry about them. If you are, then be forewarned.

ArthGuinness

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 3:52 p.m.

"If you aren't doing anything wrong, you should not worry about them." Well see there's the problem. Who's the judge of "doing anything wrong"? While we can all agree that groping little girls is wrong, what about non-criminal acts that some of society disagrees with?

Cash

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 11:44 a.m.

I've had mixed feelings on this....but to be honest, if I lived in a neighborhood where I was afraid and realized people were too afraid to "snitch" on those preying on others, I'd want a camera to do the snitching for them. It's a cruel trade....security vs privacy.....but preying on others is cruel too. Just my opinion....not right or wrong, just me.

Bertha Venation

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 8:06 p.m.

Well said, Cash. I'm with you.

Glen S.

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 11:13 a.m.

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin.

Peregrine

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 2:12 p.m.

This quote often gets thrown around. But I challenge people to think what it means and whether they truly agree. Think of the crimes that would justify taking away a person's liberty or safety. They would be pretty extreme, wouldn't they? Now compare such crimes against someone who is trying to protect their own safety or that of their family, even if temporarily. Do they really compare? Does such a person really no longer deserve safety or liberty? I don't think so. So if Franklin really did say this -- and there is some doubt given that he put it in quotation marks -- I would think lesser of him.

FredMax

Thu, May 17, 2012 : 11:46 a.m.

The obvious question is whether an "essential liberty" is lost by having video in a public place. Franklin's original usage referred to a failure of some in society to protect others from violence; a far cry from your application. And like all liberals, your take on this would change the instant it was your daughter molested in a public place by some scumbag.