You are viewing this article in the archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see
Posted on Wed, Nov 2, 2011 : 10:05 a.m.

Three candidates bring different backgrounds to race for two Lincoln Consolidated School Board seats

By Tom Perkins

Three candidates are vying for two spots on the Lincoln Consolidated School Board. Members of the new board will face financial challenges as the district grapples with dropping enrollment and takes on the task of improving Lincoln High School, which is listed among the state’s lowest achieving schools.

On Tuesday, voters will elect two board members.

Brad Labadie

Labadie said he sees the Lincoln Schools' area as lacking a city center and called the school system the community’s center. A desire to help the community by improving the school district is partly driving him to run for the board, he said. Though he has yet to serve in public office, he said his skill set from his professional life coupled with his passion for public education make him qualified for the position.

Labadie, who is a client executive at Kapnick Insurance Group in Ann Arbor, spent nine years as an administrator at the University of Michigan after receiving a secondary education degree and teaching certificate.

He said Lincoln High School’s ranking among the state’s lowest achieving schools is a district-wide issue, and plans to monitor student, educator and administrative performance are a positive step. But the board must play a key role in ensuring that the district’s plan is properly implemented, he said.

“The plan is only as good as the implementation, and that is where a strong school board is important,” Labadie said. “A strong board will make sure that the plan is carried out with the utmost fidelity, and that the plan targets and achieves the most important outcome; the increased achievement of our students at Lincoln Consolidated Schools.”

Labadie said he believes Lincoln must concentrate on the issues that the district can control; cost containment and keeping current students enrolled in the district to help stabilize revenue.

He said cost containment comes from obtaining bids for larger purchases, consolidating purchasing across all school buildings and looking at making the largest purchases with neighboring school districts.

The district must improve the student experience by developing systems to measure and emphasize student growth at all levels to keep its current students enrolled in the district, Labadie said. He added that Lincoln should continue to seek grant funding for further development of student programs, similar to the technology grant it was recently awarded.

David McMahon

McMahon has already lived through cuts at Lincoln High School - but as a student. The lifelong Lincoln-area resident grew up in the Lincoln School District and said he graduated in the top 2 percent of his 1977 class. The district eliminated all extracurricular programs and some academic programs at the time, so he said he understands what students are feeling as the district considers further cuts to deal with its budget.

Lincoln's decline in student enrollment and how that affects the district’s budget is among McMahon’s biggest concerns. He said this year's enrollment drop could translate into a $1.8 million financial hit not figured into the current budget. He suggested the district develop a short and long term-plan to address the enrollment issues as well as the declining property values and reduced state funding that are impacting its bottom line.

“If prompt actions are not taken, the cuts that will be necessary down the line will have an even greater negative impact to future students,” he said.

McMahon also wants the district to assess its current construction projects that he said appear to be running over budget and lack sound planning.

He said he can bring to the board his experience serving on other public boards, managing crisis situations and finding ‘root cause’ solutions to issues that are a part of his career as an environmental engineer.

McMahon served terms on the Washtenaw County Local Emergency Planning Committee, Augusta Township Planning Commission and recently received certification as a “professional emergency manager” by the Michigan State Police. Additionally, he has served as a HAZMAT volunteer first responder and is a volunteer coordinator for the Yankee Air Museum.

“I have a long track record of building teams that successfully respond to the need of the situation, and without singling out anyone group (to be) thrown under the bus to save the others,” he said. “This is a time where critical thinking and listening needs to happen, in addition to not being afraid to make a tough decision.”

Kim Samuelson

Samuelson is the lone incumbent among the group and has served on the school board since 2003. She currently sits as the board president and her experience includes service on multiple committees throughout the last eight years.

She said she the two most important issues facing the board at what would be the start of her third term is improving student achievement and addressing declining enrollment. Many of the district’s schools are on an upward trajectory and have made AYP, but problems remain at the high school, Samuelson said.

She highlighted several measures the board and district have taken to address that issue, including the formation of the “Persistently Lowest Achieving Committee.” The district is also currently formulating a restructuring plan at the high school that touches on the goals of its strategic plan, Samuelson said, and is including staff, students and the community in that process.

She said continual improvement is contingent upon an aligned curriculum, providing instruction that meets each individual student's needs, common assessing and continuing with the current leadership in place.

Improving achievement at the high school and communicating the district’s success to the community would play a significant role in addressing the declining enrollment issues, Samuelson said.

“We will continue to emulate the successful programs we currently have in place and look for best practices that will assist us in improving achievement,” she said.


average joe

Thu, Nov 3, 2011 : 1:41 p.m.

Kim S. highlighted several measures the board & district have taken to address the issue of the high school being named on the "persistently lowest achieving" list from the state. Two facts need to be pointed out here. First, the board & the district just began these measures as a reaction to, and also as a requirement of the state, for being named to the PLA list. This wasn't a new initiative by the board to increase achievement levels at the high school. They are now required to address the problem. Secondly, one needs to focus on the word 'persistantly', as in lowest achieving. Kim S. has been the leader of the school board for several years now, and has been on the board for 8, and she states that "continual improvement is contingent upon....continuing with the current leadership in place". Persistant doesn't mean that the scores are very low just in the last year. The scores have been low for several years, and until recently were not addressed by the board that Kim S. sits as president of. PLA didn't seem like much of a priority to the current board until now. It's time for a couple of new faces on the board.

average joe

Thu, Nov 3, 2011 : 5:14 p.m.

MrWsmith-To make the list of PLA's, the state uses the following guidelines(from Mich dept of educ. website, in brief-) 'The Top-to-Bottom ranking list(PLA) was developed using student testing data for math and reading on the MEAP and Michigan Merit Exam from the 2006-07 through 2010-11 school years' So the achievement results used are not something new, therefore they are 'persistant'. And even though the high school is 'new' to the PLA list, it doesn't hide the fact that it is not doing well historically on the above mentioned tests. I am glad that you have attended many board meetings, & its a shame that there aren't more on attendance. I too have attended board meetings, & read the board minutes online, and in my opinion, the board was 'officially' concerned about performance issues when tests were being taken, & when test results were posted. Again, a reactionary measure.


Thu, Nov 3, 2011 : 3:40 p.m.

Though, this is only the second year the PLA list has existed, and last year Lincoln High School wasn't considered a "persistently low achieving" school. So I'm not really sure if that can be considered "persistent" when it's only the first time LHS has turned up on a list that has only been in existence for a year or so. Also, I attend just about every Lincoln school board meeting, and I don't think it's accurate to say that the district and board weren't discussing performance prior to the PLA listing. I won't argue that more could have been done, but to say that nothing was being done is not the case.