You are viewing this article in the archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see
Posted on Thu, Nov 17, 2011 : 5:39 p.m.

Planned dorm renovations show University of Michigan's North Campus is getting left behind

By Kellie Woodhouse

Dorm Side by side.jpg

Left: The Rosa Parks Lounge in the newly renovated Stockwell Hall on campus at the University of Michigan. Right: The community center in the University of Michigan dormitory Baits I.

Melanie Maxwell I

Previous story: Dorm closings will force some University of Michigan students to look off campus

The University of Michigan Board of Regents on Thursday approved a $12 million renovation to a 575-bed North Campus dormitory.

At the same time, regents approved the schematic design for a $116 million renovation to East Quadrangle, a 860-bed dorm on Central Campus.

While East Quad houses nearly 300 more students than Baits II on North Campus, its renovation is nearly ten times more costly than Baits II.

East Quad also houses the university's Residential College.

East Quad was built in the 1940s. An addition was added in 1967, and it has not had a significant renovation since. Baits II was built in 1967 and, aside from recently getting a new $3 million boiler and pipe system, has not been upgraded.


The outside of Baits I on North Campus

Melanie Maxwell I


The outside of the newly renovated Couzens Hall.

Jeff Sainlar I

The disparity between the two renovations shows that thus far the Residential Life Initiative —a University Housing plan that has led to the renovation of at least one major dorm a year— has significantly prioritized dorms on Central Campus and U-M's Hill neighborhood over those on North Campus.

From 2008 to 2013, the university will have spent $440 million renovating and building dorms on Central Campus.

In contrast, it will have spent $15 million updating North Campus dorms.

North Campus is commonly considered a less desirable area to live because of its distance from downtown Ann Arbor and Central Campus, where the majority of the school's classroom buildings are located. The growing disparity between the dorms in the two areas could possibly heighten already-existing aversion to North Campus residence halls.

Baits I, one of the four North Campus dormitories, is in such bad condition that U-M said it will close permanently next year. The scope of renovations needed and distant location make Baits I not worth renovating, University Housing has said.

Regent Andrea Fischer Newman said that after housing assignments each year, her office is flooded with calls and emails "from people who are upset about being assigned to North Campus."

Some students recently said they feel the difference between the locations.

U-M freshman Austin Andres says he doesn't mind living at Baits II —he enjoys the "private, quiet setting, it's nice for studying"— but says it's like living at an entirely different university.

"It's not like the other residence halls," he said. "It's very small and almost feels more like an apartment complex. The carpet's older (and) it looks older, but it's not in bad shape."

Baits II resident Anna Metzger says the halls and study rooms are smaller than many dorms on Central Campus, but she lives in a suite as a freshman and doesn't have to share a bathroom with her hall, which she likes.

"It's obviously not the most newly renovated facility," she said.

About 2,200 freshmen, or one-third of the freshman class, live on North Campus, according to Linda Newman, University Housing director.

Many are living in apartment-style housing that was originally intended for graduate students who prefer quieter, more isolated living quarters.

It's a difference that regents are acknowledging as they approved the most recent renovations Thursday.

"They’re not perfectly suited for 18-year-old new students and they don’t compare to the other facilities," said Regent Laurence B. Deitch. "We charge a healthy price and I'm not (sure) there's full value for our lower division students when the facilties aren’t there and aren’t up to snuff."

Screen shot 2011-11-17 at 4.55.30 PM.png

University of Michigan Regent Andrea Fischer Newman at a Board of Regents meeting in 2008. Fisher questioned U-M's current student housing configuration.

Kellie Woodhouse |

Elizabeth Zollweg, manager of Go North!, a U-M initiative to create more buzz around the relatively isolated area of campus, said there is a "challenge with finding that sense of community" on North Campus.

"We don't have the grandiose (feel) of Angell Hall or the Union," she said. "We don't have that place where students can study and hang out and grab a bite to eat in the same place."

Go North! facilitates big events —such as hot air balloon rides— to make living on North Campus more exciting, but it's unclear yet whether the relatively new initiative can infuse the energy in dorms that many students seek.

"The hallways are so small people don’t hang out," said Kendall Zemmin, a U-M freshman. Zemmin lives at Baits I, which is closing. Baits II has a very similar layout.

Zemmin and other North Campus residents say that it's hard not to be jealous of students living in Central Campus dorms: They're nicer, closer to restaurants and classes and have active communities.

"It’s not really the dorm experience you think of," U-M freshman and Baits I resident Madison Hoase said of living on North Campus.

Newman said Thursday that University Housing needs to develop a long-term plan about dormitory renovations.

"I, for one, would like to see a longer term strategic plan for housing… as opposed to hearing about things one year or two years at a time," she said.

"As the rest of the university grows and prospers, we have to take care of this aspect of the university," Newman continued. "I don’t think we are devoting enough attention to solutions for student living, student life."

Vice President for Student Affairs E. Royster Harper said University Housing was in the process of developing a long-term plan.

"We have been working hard to enhance the vibrancy of North Campus," Harper said.

Recent and planned U-M residence hall renovations:

  • Baits II: To be completed by 2013 with a budget of $12 million.
  • East Quadrangle Renovation: Currently in the planning stages with a budget of $116 million.
  • Lawyers Club: Currently in the planning stages with a budget of $39 million.
  • Alice C. Lloyd Hall: Currently under construction with a budget of $56 million.
  • Couzens Hall: Reopened in 2011 after $49 million renovation.
  • North Quad: Opened in 2010 after $75 million construction project.
  • Stockwell Hall: Reopened in 2009 after a $39.6 million renovation.
  • Hill Dining Center: Reopened in 2008 after $21 million renovation.
  • Mosher Jordan Hall: Reopened in 2008 after $44.1 million renovation.

Kellie Woodhouse covers higher education for Reach her at or 734-623-4602 and follow her on twitter.


Peter Logan

Fri, Nov 18, 2011 : 8:40 p.m.

This analysis, "Planned dorm renovations show UM north campus is getting left behind," implies that the university is prioritizing renovations based on location. The headline is misleading. The Residential Life Initiatives (RLI), launched in 2004, prioritizes renovations based on need, not location. The university has focused the resources on the installation of modern life-safety systems throughout the residence halls, and addressing those halls with acute infrastructure needs and the greatest opportunity to strengthen the connection between living and learning for our students. One of the very first projects out of the RLI funding was the installation of fire-suppression and the creation of the Blue Apple Café in Bursley Hall on North Campus. Peter Logan

Seasoned Cit

Fri, Nov 18, 2011 : 4:09 p.m.

Duh... Seems to me that all of the dorms that have been renovated are the oldest which were built on Central Campus. The newest dorms (other than North Quad) were built on North Campus and they will have work done on them after the Older ones are updated. It's not an effort to bypass North Campus. Remember that the N Campus wasn't even started 'till the late 50's.


Fri, Nov 18, 2011 : 2:23 p.m.

The world needs a moticon for sarcasm, since I think that is what smokeblwr meant, but I can't tell for sure. It is probably a good idea to close Baits I and in a few years replace it with something modern. North campus has been growing, and will continue to grow, but the students who will want to be there always have been the more studious. With Plymouth road growing and having some much more restaurants and courses it is more desirable than years ago when I was a student, but probably not for freshmen. As for the difference in cost of renovations, a lot has to do with the age of the buildings, the usage and other factors so I would not be able to tell if the difference is due to a main campus bias or not. As for Northwoods, everyone I know who has lived their has loved it, but they had families. For a single freshman it would not be the right place.

Cathy Gramze

Fri, Nov 18, 2011 : 2:18 p.m.

Baits I and II were originally "graduate student housing?" Nice lack of research there, Kellie. They were originally married student apartments. I lived in one of those apartments. I suppose they were later made into grad student housing.

Rod Johnson

Fri, Nov 18, 2011 : 4:59 p.m.

From the UM Housing site: "Vera B. Baits Houses were built in 1966 and 1967 as coeducational residences for upperlevel undergrads and graduate students."

Rod Johnson

Fri, Nov 18, 2011 : 4:57 p.m.

No, they were originally grad student housing. Married student housing, later called Family Housing, was Northwood 1-5. Are you saying you lived in Baits as a married student? I've never heard of that.


Fri, Nov 18, 2011 : 12:22 p.m.

I spent 3 years in Bursley and loved it, even though all my classes were on central campus. But Baits and Northwood would be an entirely different experience, and not a good one. I do think that freshman assigned to those dorms should see a reduction in room and board costs - it's just not comparable to the other forms.


Fri, Nov 18, 2011 : 2:10 a.m.

I think it just goes to show that UM recognizes that America's future is not within the Engineering and Science realms but rather the liberal arts and services. Go Blue!